Toward an Empirical Analysis of Justice in Ecosystem Governance
Toward an Empirical Analysis of Justice in Ecosystem Governance
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/conl.12142
复制
发表时间：
2014-11
影响因子：
8.5
通讯作者：
T. Sikor;Adrian Martin;J. Fisher;Jun He
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
T. Sikor;Adrian Martin;J. Fisher;Jun He
《生物多样性公约》下的2010年名古屋议定书以及主要国际保护组织最近的政策变化突出表明，目前有兴趣重新审视保护的道德理由。对公平和人权的关注挑战了以人类对自然、共同利益或后代权利的责任为中心的既定正义观念。本文介绍了一种实证方法来分析正义，并展示了保护科学家如何将其应用于基于生态系统服务的治理（或简而言之，生态系统治理）。它确定了占主导地位的正义观念，并指出它们与功利主义的正义理论的兼容性。然后，它讨论了有限的适当性，这些概念在许多情况下，其中保护发生在全球南方，并探讨如何生态系统治理的技术组成部分影响的概念在实践中的实现。该综述强调了保护科学家和管理人员除了分析生态系统治理的有效性和效率外，还需要分析生态系统治理的公正性。正义提供了一个更全面的角度比公平的保护治理的实证分析。
The 2010 Nagoya Protocol under the Convention on Biological Diversity and recent changes in the policies of major international conservation organizations highlight current interest in revisiting the moral case for conservation. Concerns with equity and human rights challenge well‐established notions of justice centered on human responsibility toward nature, the common good or the rights of future generations. This review introduces an empirical approach to the analysis of justice and shows how conservation scientists can apply it to ecosystem services‐based governance (or in short, ecosystem governance). It identifies dominant notions of justice and points out their compatibility with utilitarian theories of justice. It then discusses the limited appropriateness of these notions in many contexts in which conservation takes place in the Global South and explores how technical components of ecosystem governance influence the realization of the notions in practice. The review highlights the need for conservation scientists and managers to analyze the justice of ecosystem governance in addition to their effectiveness and efficiency. Justice offers a more encompassing perspective than equity for the empirical analysis of conservation governance.