Institutional determinants of brownfield formation in Chinese cities and urban villages
Institutional determinants of brownfield formation in Chinese cities and urban villages
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.05.005
复制
发表时间：
2014-10
影响因子：
6.8
通讯作者：
Y. Liu;F. Oort;S. Geertman;Yanliu Lin
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Y. Liu;F. Oort;S. Geertman;Yanliu Lin
棕地是以往经济活动的空间表现，在改革开放后中国快速城市化的环境中，棕地的再开发可能有助于实现更可持续的城市土地利用。由于中国独特的制度背景，中国的棕地可以区分为两种类型，即城市棕地和城中村棕地。在此基础上，引入了工业化、郊区化和去工业化三个阶段的阶段模型，对中国城市两种类型棕地的形成过程进行了概念化。城市核心经济活动的去工业化被认为是棕地形成的主要原因。本文详细阐述了城市棕地和城中村棕地的不同特征，包括土地所有权、场地规模、空间分布、场地创建机制以及所涉及的利益相关者。本文的结论是，未来中国棕地再开发策略的研究需要特别关注城市地区和城中村的不同制度设置。
Brownfields are spatial manifestations of previous economic activities, and their redevelopment may contribute to a more sustainable urban land-use in the rapidly urbanising environment of post-reform China. Owing to China's unique institutional background, two types of brownfields can be distinguished in China, namely of brownfields in urban areas and brownfields in urban villages. Based on this twofold classification, a stage model consisting of three stages (industrialization, suburbanization, and deindustrialization) is introduced to conceptualize the formation process of brownfields in both types of locations in Chinese cities. Deindustrialization of economic activity in the urban core is considered as the main cause of brownfield creation. Differing characteristics of brownfields in urban areas and brownfields in urban villages are interpreted in detail, consisting of land ownership, size of the site, spatial distribution, the mechanisms by which the sites are created, and the stakeholders involved. This article concludes that future research on brownfield redeveloping strategies in China needs to pay particular attention to different institutional settings of urban areas and urban villages.