A comparison of four functional tests in discriminating fallers from non-fallers in older people
A comparison of four functional tests in discriminating fallers from non-fallers in older people
复制标题
区分老年人跌倒者和非跌倒者的四种功能测试的比较
DOI:
10.1080/dre.25.1.45.50
复制
发表时间:
2003
影响因子:
2.2
通讯作者:
S. Lo
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
A. Chiu;S. Au;S. Lo
Purpose : Which functional tests on mobility and balance can better screen older people at risk of falls is unclear. This study aims to compare the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Tinetti Mobility Score (TMS), Elderly Mobility Scale (EMS) and Timed Up and Go test (TUG) in discriminating fallers from non-fallers in older people. Method : This was a case-control study involving one rater who conducted a mobility and balance assessment on subjects using the four functional tests in random sequence. Subjects recruited included 17 and 22 older people with a history of single and multiple falls respectively from a public Falls Clinic, and 39 community-dwellers without fall history and whose age, sex and BMI matched those of the fallers. All subjects underwent the mobility and balance assessment within one day. Results : Single fallers performed better than multiple fallers in all four functional tests but were worse than non-fallers in the BBS, TMS and TUG. The BBS demonstrated the best discriminating ability, with high sensitivity and specificity. The BBS item `pick up an object from the floor' was the best at screening fallers. Conclusion : BBS was the most powerful functional test of the four in discriminating fallers from non-faller.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.1001/jama.1993.03500010075035
发表时间:
1993-01
期刊:
JAMA
影响因子:
--
作者:
M. Tinetti;Wen-Liang Liu;Elizabeth B. Claus
通讯作者:
M. Tinetti;Wen-Liang Liu;Elizabeth B. Claus
影响因子:
4.6
作者:
Beck;Shultz Ek
通讯作者:
Beck;Shultz Ek
影响因子:
3.2
作者:
Shumway-Cook, A;Brauer, S;Woollacott, M
通讯作者:
Woollacott, M
影响因子:
6.7
作者:
Vellas, BJ;Wayne, SJ;Garry, PJ
通讯作者:
Garry, PJ