The assessment of professional competence: building blocks for theory development
The assessment of professional competence: building blocks for theory development
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2010.04.001
复制
发表时间：
2010-12-01
影响因子：
5.5
通讯作者：
Hodges, B.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
van der Vleuten, C. P. M.;Schuwirth, L. W. T.;Hodges, B.
本文介绍了专业能力评估的经验教训。根据米勒的金字塔，建立评估技术之间的区别是评估“知道”，“知道如何”和“显示如何”和最近的发展，在评估（临床）性能的“做”的水平。从对现有评估技术的研究和经验中得出了一些一般性的教训。在这里，许多悖论被揭示出来，经验结果往往是违反直觉的。工具进行评估的“做”的水平进行分类和描述，并得出额外的一般经验教训，这方面的业绩评估。这些经验教训也可被解读为评估（方案）的一般原则，并可为支持适当和最先进的评估做法提供理论基础。(C)2010爱思唯尔有限公司版权所有。
This article presents lessons learnt from experiences with assessment of professional competence. Based on Miller's pyramid, a distinction is made between established assessment technology for assessing 'knows', 'knowing how' and 'showing how' and more recent developments in the assessment of (clinical) performance at the 'does' level. Some general lessons are derived from research of and experiences with the established assessment technology. Here, many paradoxes are revealed and empirical outcomes are often counterintuitive. Instruments for assessing the 'does' level are classified and described, and additional general lessons for this area of performance assessment are derived. These lessons can also be read as general principles of assessment (programmes) and may provide theoretical building blocks to underpin appropriate and state-of-the-art assessment practices. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.