Perceptions of skill development of participants in three national career development programs for women faculty in academic medicine.
Perceptions of skill development of participants in three national career development programs for women faculty in academic medicine.
复制标题
参与者在三个国家职业发展方案中针对学术医学教师的技能发展的看法。
DOI：
10.1097/acm.0000000000000251
复制
发表时间：
2014-06
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Chang S
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Helitzer DL;Newbill SL;Morahan PS;Magrane D;Cardinali G;Wu CC;Chang S
美国医学院协会（AAMC）和德雷克塞尔大学医学院设计并实施了国家职业发展计划（CDPs），以帮助女教师获得和加强在学术医学中取得成功所需的技能。作者假设，女性在CDP中获得的技能会因职业阶段和参加的课程而异。2011年，作者调查了一个全国性的队列，其中2,779名女性被列入AAMC教师名册，她们在1988年至2010年期间也参加了三个CDP（早期和中期职业女性医学研讨会和/或学术医学的行政领导）之一，以检查她们的特征和CDP经验。参与者从16项技能中指出每项技能是新获得的，改进的，还是没有因为他们的计划参与而改进的。在2 537名符合条件的CDP妇女中，942人点击了邀请电子邮件中的链接，879人（35%）完成了调查。受访者是学术医学领域的女教师代表。与会者对社区发展方案评价很高。几乎所有人都报告说，从发展项目中获得和/或提高了技能。四种技能在所有三个项目中占主导地位：人际交往技能，领导力，谈判和网络。与会者认可的技能因受访者的职业阶段而异，而不是参加的项目。妇女参加者认为，她们从参加社区发展方案中获得或提高了不同的技能。确定CDPs可以支持妇女在学术医学方面的进步的方式需要更深入地了解参与者从CDPs中寻求什么，以及他们如何使用计划内容来推进自己的职业生涯。
The Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) and Drexel University College of Medicine have designed and implemented national career development programs (CDPs) to help women faculty acquire and strengthen skills needed for success in academic medicine. The authors hypothesized that skills women acquired in CDPs would vary by career stage and program attended. In 2011, the authors surveyed a national cohort of 2,779 women listed in the AAMC Faculty Roster who also attended one of three CDPs (Early- and Mid-Career Women in Medicine Seminars, and/or Executive Leadership in Academic Medicine) between 1988 and 2010 to examine their characteristics and CDP experiences. Participants indicated from a list of 16 skills whether each skill was newly acquired, improved, or not improved as a result of their program participation. Of 2537 eligible CDP women, 942 clicked on the link in an invitation e-mail and 879 (35%) completed the survey. Respondents were representative of women faculty in academic medicine. Participants rated the CDPs highly. Almost all reported gaining and/or improving skills from the CDP. Four skills predominated across all three programs: interpersonal skills, leadership, negotiation, and networking. The skills that attendees endorsed differed by respondents’ career stages, more so than by program attended. Women participants perceived varying skills gained or improved from their attendance at the CDPs. Determining ways in which CDPs can support women’s advancement in academic medicine requires a deeper understanding of what participants seek from CDPs and how they use program content to advance their careers.