PURDUE PEGBOARD - NORMATIVE DATA ON 1334 SCHOOL-CHILDREN
PURDUE PEGBOARD - NORMATIVE DATA ON 1334 SCHOOL-CHILDREN
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/15374417909532912
复制
发表时间：
1979-01-01
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
BROMAN, M
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
GARDNER, RA;BROMAN, M
普渡钉板提供了良好的精细运动协调性测试。不幸的是，尚未从儿童身上收集到大量数据。因此，大多数检查者主观地使用该仪器——依赖于他们对正常和异常表现的印象和经验。为了提高这一宝贵工具的功效，作者和他的助手收集了 1334 名 5-16 岁正常学童（663 名男孩和 671 名女孩）的数据。该小组被分为半岁年龄组。对于每个半年组，提供平均值、标准差和百分位等级，使检查者能够量化患者在这项有价值的精细运动协调测试中的得分。为了确定该仪器在 MBD 诊断电池中的使用是否合理，我们将正常儿童的分数与 212 名患有明确诊断的神经性学习障碍 (MBD) 的儿童（145 名男孩和 67 名女孩）的分数进行了比较。
The Purdue Pegboard provides an excellent test of fine motor coordination. Unfortunately, extensive data have not been collected from children. Accordingly, most examiners use the instrument subjectively ‐ relying on their impressions and experience regarding normal and abnormal performance. To enhance the efficacy of this valuable instrument, the author and his assistants collected data from 1334 normal school children (663 boys and 671 girls) ages 5–16. The group was divided into half‐year age groups. For each half‐year group means, standard deviations, and percentile ranks are provided, enabling the examiner to quantify a patient's score on this valuable test of fine motor coordination. In order to ascertain whether the instrument's use in the MBD diagnostic battery is justified, the scores of the normal children were compared with those of 212 children (145 boys and 67 girls) with well‐diagnosed neurologically based learning disabilities (MBD)