After the Great Divide: Modernism, Mass Culture, Postmodernism

After the Great Divide: Modernism, Mass Culture, Postmodernism
复制标题

大分水岭之后:现代主义、大众文化、后现代主义

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
1989
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Andreas Huyssen
Andreas Huyssen
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Michael T. Jones;Andreas Huyssen

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

“休森是最全面、最聪明的后现代艺术和文学批评家之一,他在这里收集了一系列关于波莫的文章……《乡村之声文学增刊……》。他的作品对马克思主义和后结构主义之间存在的问题关系保持警惕。”美国文学史……“富有挑战性且精明。”今日世界文学“休森对这一有争议的批评声音的冷静描述为当今文化讨论的阴霾带来了令人欢迎的澄清,并明确证明来自德国左派传统的评论在当代批评中发挥着不可或缺的作用。” 《德国季刊》……“读完这本书后,我们肯定会对导致现在的力量以及我们仍然面临的可能性有更深入的了解。”批判文本……“丰富的、多方面的研究。”休森认为,后现代主义不能被视为与过去的彻底决裂,因为它深受现代性文化中的另一种趋势——历史先锋派的影响。
"One of the most comprehensive and intelligent postmodern critics of art and literature, Huyssen collects here a series of his essays on pomo... " Village Voice Literary Supplement..". his work remains alert to the problematic relationship obtaining between marxisms and poststructuralisms." American Literary History..". challenging and astute." World Literature Today"Huyssen s level-headed account of this controversial constellation of critical voices brings welcome clarification to today s murky haze of cultural discussion and proves definitively that commentary from the tradition of the German Left has an indispensable role to play in contemporary criticism." The German Quarterly..". we will certainly have, after reading this book, a deeper understanding of the forces that have led up to the present and of the possibilities still open to us." Critical Texts..". a rich, multifaceted study." The Year s Work in English StudiesHuyssen argues that postmodernism cannot be regarded as a radical break with the past, as it is deeply indebted to that other trend within the culture of modernity the historical avant-garde."