Colonialism and Cold War: The United States and the Struggle for Indonesian Independence, 1943-49.
Colonialism and Cold War: The United States and the Struggle for Indonesian Independence, 1943-49.
复制标题
殖民主义与冷战：美国与印度尼西亚独立斗争，1943-49。
DOI：
10.2307/2149827
复制
发表时间：
1982
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
R. McMahon
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Roger Dingman;R. McMahon
没有试图将高棉语文本从属于它，这是他的功劳。他的笔记大部分是翔实和有趣的。在消极的一面，他似乎也过于倾向于跟随他的前任，而他对高棉语文本的处理由于他在过去十年中没有利用任何语言学的发现而受到很大影响：他对古高棉语词法和句法的太多评论都是过时和错误的。这是令人失望的发现他重复，甚至发展（页。xviii-xix）的想法杜邦和他的前辈的大意是，前吴哥高棉是“僵化”和不系统的。此外，作者没有明确说明他的译音政策，因而受到前后不一的指控：读者有权知道高棉文第一行的jagat ta是jagat-ta，正如梵文第一行的Namds - sivdy = dstu。然而，这本书最令人烦恼的缺点是由于出版商的一个重大疏忽，即五个板块的质量差。在第一张照片中，上面提到的1958年大火中幸存下来的两块石碑碎片之一，文字几乎难以辨认。另外四张是石碑四个面的照片;这些照片需要减少到原来的三分之一，而石碑本身似乎是老式的Lottin de拉瓦尔类型，众所周知很难复制。因此，这些对读者也没有什么用处。更令人遗憾的是，除了Aymonier出版的C面的一部分之外，没有巴黎邮票页的读者无法获得铭文的传真。
credit for not attempting to subordinate the Khmer text to it. His notes are for the most part informative and interesting. On the negative side, he seems here also overly disposed to follow the lead of his predecessors, while his treatment of the Khmer text suffers considerably from his failure to have made any use of the findings of linguistics over the past decade: too many of his comments on Old Khmer morphology and syntax are outdated and mistaken. It is disappointing to find him repeating and even developing (pp. xviii-xix) the ideas of Dupont and his forerunners to the effect that pre-Angkorian Khmer was "rigid" and unsystematic. Also, the author has exposed himself to charges of inconsistency by failing to give a clear statement of his policy governing his transliterations: the reader is entitled to know that the jagat ta in the first line of the Khmer text is jagat —ta, just as the first line of the Sanskrit has Namds — sivdy = dstu. The most vexing shortcoming of the volume, however, is owing to a major oversight on the publisher's part, namely, the poor quality of the five plates. In the first of these, a photograph of one of the two fragments of the stele that survived the 1958 fire mentioned above, the text is virtually illegible. The other four are photographs of estampages of the stele's four faces; these entail a reduction to one-third of the original, while the estampages themselves appear to be of the old-fashioned Lottin de Laval type, notoriously difficult to reproduce. These too, therefore, are of little if any use to the reader. The state of these plates is all the more regrettable in that, aside from part of face C published by Aymonier, facsimiles of the inscription are unavailable to readers without access to the Paris estampages.