The Art of Knowing
The Art of Knowing
复制标题
认识的艺术
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
P. Duguid
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
P. Duguid
自其出现以来，Lave和Wenger（1990，1991）的“实践社区”（以下简称CoP）概念已经发展了一个非常广泛的追随者。它的吸引力在很大程度上要归功于社区的诱人特征，被恰当地描述为一个“热情的说服词”（威廉姆斯，1976年，第66页）。正如Osterlund和Carlile（2005）所指出的，大多数对Lave和Wenger的引用都集中在社区而忽视了实践。然而，正是实践使CoP成为一种独特的社区1实践类型，因此，CoP分析至关重要。然而，我们不应该忽视社区。扶贫委员会本质上是一项社会工作，这一点是不可削弱的。
In the years since its appearance, Lave and Wenger’s (1990, 1991) notion of ‘community of practice’ (hereafter, CoP) has developed a remarkably wide following. Its appeal owes a good deal to the seductive character of community, aptly described as a ‘warmly persuasive word’ (Williams, 1976, p. 66). As Osterlund and Carlile (2005) note, most citations of Lave and Wenger have focused on community and ignored practice. Yet it is practice that makes the CoP, the social locus in which a practice is sustained and reproduced overtime, a distinct type of community1 practice is thus critical to CoP analysis. We should not, however, lose sight of the community. The CoP is inherently and irreducibly a social endeavour.