Personality and physical activity: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Personality and physical activity: A systematic review and meta-analysis
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.paid.2014.08.023
复制
发表时间:
2015-01-01
影响因子:
4.3
通讯作者:
Dishman, Rodney K.
Dishman, Rodney K.
中科院分区:
心理学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Wilson, Kathryn E.;Dishman, Rodney K.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

人格是否决定身体活动或其结果与理论和公共卫生有关,但尚未得到充分研究。我们估计了大五人格因素和身体活动之间的人口相关性,并检查它们是否根据样本特征和研究特征而变化。根据PRISMA指南对2013年11月1日之前以英语发表的文章进行数据库检索。共有64项研究,包括88,400名参与者,得出了外向性(88),神经质(82),尽责性(69),开放性(51)和可接受性(52)的影响(k)。外向性(r = 0.1076)、神经质(r = 0.0710)、尽责性(r = 0.1037)和开放性(r = 0.0344)的平均相关系数显著,但不包括易受攻击性(r = 0.0020)。影响是中度异质性的(12范围= 44-65%),并因样本特征而异(例如,年龄、性别或临床状态)和/或研究特征(例如,测量质量或项目格式)。这项分析扩展了之前评论的结果,并为身体活动和开放性之间的关系提供了新的支持。未来的研究应该使用更好的体力活动和前瞻性设计的措施,调整统计文物,并考虑人格概念化的进展。(C)2014爱思唯尔有限公司版权所有。
Whether personality determines physical activity or its outcomes is relevant for theory and public health but has been understudied. We estimated the population correlations between Big-Five personality factors and physical activity and examined whether they varied according to sample characteristics and study features. Database searches were conducted according to PRISMA guidelines, for articles published in the English language prior to November 1st, 2013. Sixty-four studies including a total of 88,400 participants yielded effects (k) for Extraversion (88), Neuroticism (82), Conscientiousness (69), Openness (51) and Agreeableness (52). Significant mean r was found for Extraversion (r = .1076), Neuroticism (r = .0710), Conscientiousness (r = .1037) and Openness (r = .0344), but not Agreeableness (r = .0020). Effects were moderately heterogeneous (12 range = 44-65%) and varied by sample characteristics (e.g., age, gender, or clinical status) and/or study features (e.g., measure quality or item format). This analysis expands results of previous reviews and provides new support for a relationship between physical activity and Openness. Future studies should use better measures of physical activity and prospective designs, adjust for statistical artifacts, and consider advances in the conceptualization of personality. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.