Vasten valtavirtaa - kontingenssi, polkuriippuvuus ja konvergenssi suomalaisen perusopetuksen laadunarviointimallin kehityskuluissa
Vasten valtavirtaa - kontingenssi, polkuriippuvuus ja konvergenssi suomalaisen perusopetuksen laadunarviointimallin kehityskuluissa
复制标题
Vasten valtavirtaa - kontingenssi、polkuriippuvuus 和 konvergenssi suomalaisen perusopetuksen laadunarviointimallin kehityskuluissa
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2010
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Risto Rinne
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Hanna Simola;Janne Varjo;Risto Rinne
针对芬兰基础教育体系中质量评价模型的主流——偶然性、路径依赖和趋同，本文重振了比较研究的标准概念：路径依赖、趋同和偶然性，并将其应用于20世纪90年代初以来的芬兰教育政策和政治。重点是综合教育的质量保证与评价。本文通过分析各种形式的QAE在芬兰已经或尚未得到接受和调解的特殊和模糊的方式来阐述芬兰的QAE政策并将其置于背景中。研究数据包括有关国家一级义务教育规定的文件：法律和立法草案、备忘录和报告。专题访谈补充了文献分析。一方面，作为一个先进的自由主义西方社会，趋同地追求国际认可，另一方面，根深蒂固地依赖传统的社会民主主义和土地平等主义，这两者之间似乎存在着强烈的矛盾，这使得芬兰的QAE政策奇怪地两极分化。在国家教育修辞中，全球教育改革话语已经取得了霸权地位，而在地方层面的实施过程中，基于平等主义和对过去规范控制和今天排名的反感，一种沉默的共识仍然存在。
Against the mainstream – contingency, path dependence and convergence of quality evaluation models in the Finnish basic education system The article revitalises standard concepts of comparative studies: path dependence, convergence and contingency, applied to Finnish education policy and politics since the early 1990s. The focus is on Quality Assurance and Evaluation (QAE) of comprehensive schooling. The article elaborates and contextualises Finnish QAE policy by analysing the peculiar and ambiguous ways in which various forms QAE have or have not been received and mediated in Finland. Research data consists of documents concerning compulsory education provision at the national level: laws and legislative drafts, memoranda and reports. The documentary analyses are complemented by thematic interviews. It appears that a strong contradiction between convergent pursuit of international acceptance as an advanced liberal Western society on the one hand, and deep rooted path dependence on traditional social democratic and agrarian egalitarianism, on the other, have made Finnish QAE policy curiously bipolar. In national educational rhetorics, global education reform discourse has achieved a hegemonic position, while in implementation processes at the local level a silent consensus remains, based on egalitarianism and antipathy toward both the normative control of the past and the ranking lists of today.