A percentile rank score of group productivity: an evaluation of publication productivity for researchers from various fields
A percentile rank score of group productivity: an evaluation of publication productivity for researchers from various fields
复制标题
团体生产力的百分位排名：对不同领域研究人员的发表生产力的评估
DOI：
10.1007/s11192-022-04278-w
复制
发表时间：
2022
期刊：
影响因子：
3.9
通讯作者：
Yasunaga Takuo
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Yamamoto Koh;Yasunaga Takuo
群体研究绩效评价的困难主要来自两个方面：1）群体规模或群体成员学科性质的差异; 2）个体研究绩效的偏态分布。本研究试图克服这一困难，侧重于基于出版生产率的研究绩效。我们采用论文数量的归一化指数，其中考虑了出版效率，并通过学科平均值校正了出版强度的学科变化，以计算新的百分位数排名得分。这个分数是根据一个稀有的人是有价值的原则制定的。该分数还与日本17所大学教师的出版数据进行了测试。采用标准化指数提高了从事高生产率学科的教师相对较少的大学的得分，从而使大学排名更加合理。该排名显示出与先前建立的百分位排名分数的高度相关性，该分数是为引文分析而开发的，并且与研究中的几所大学的评估人员的判断一致。新评分较前一评分的优点是，在确定等级分类方案和给予每个等级类别的权重时没有任意性的余地。
The difficulty in evaluating the research performance of groups is attributable to the following two factors: 1) difference of population size or discipline of group members and 2) skewed distribution of the research performance of individuals. This study attempts to overcome this difficulty, focusing on the research performance based on publication productivity. We employ the normalized index for the number of papers, in which publication efficiency was considered and disciplinary variation in the publication intensity was corrected by the disciplinary averages, to calculate a new percentile rank score. The score was developed on the basis of the principle that a person who is rare is valuable. The score was also tested with publication data for faculty members of 17 Japanese universities. The employment of the normalized index increased the score of universities with relatively few faculty members working in the disciplines of high productivity, resulting in more plausible university rankings. The rankings show a high correlation with those for a previously established percentile rank score, which was developed for citation analysis, and they are consistent with the judgment by evaluators of several universities under study. The advantage of the new score over the previous one is that it has no room for arbitrariness in determining the scheme of rank classification and the weights given to each rank class.
登录
查看更多内容
跨学科界限量化出版生产力的标准化指数
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
--
影响因子：
--
作者：
K. Yamamoto;M. Ishikawa
通讯作者：
M. Ishikawa
反对绝对方法：相对科学计量指标和关系图表作为评估工具
DOI：
10.1016/b978-0-444-70537-2.50010-6
发表时间：
1988
期刊：
--
影响因子：
--
作者：
A. Schubert;W. Glaenzel;T. Braun
通讯作者：
T. Braun
影响因子：
3.9
作者：
Abramo, Giovanni;D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea
通讯作者：
D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea
菲律宾教育和心理学的研究生产力以及与东盟国家的比较
影响因子：
3.9
作者：
Lorelei R. Vinluan
通讯作者：
Lorelei R. Vinluan
影响因子：
3.9
作者：
Gul, Sumeer;Nisa, Nahida Tun;Ahmad, Suhail
通讯作者：
Ahmad, Suhail