Social motives and cognitive power-sex associations: predictors of aggressive sexual behavior.
Social motives and cognitive power-sex associations: predictors of aggressive sexual behavior.
复制标题
社会动机和认知权力-性关联：攻击性性行为的预测因素。
DOI：
10.1037//0022-3514.78.3.559
复制
发表时间：
2000
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
Zurbriggen,EL
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Zurbriggen,EL
本研究探讨内隐社会动机和认知权力-性关联是否能预测攻击性行为的自我报告。参与者根据主题统觉测试的图片写故事，这些图片根据权力和亲密关系动机进行评分。他们还完成了一项词汇决定启动任务，该任务提供了"权力"和"性"概念之间认知关联强度的指数。对于男性来说，高水平的权力动机和强大的权力-性别协会预测更频繁的侵略。也有一个互动：权力动机是无关的侵略与权力性协会最弱的男性。对于女性来说，高水平的亲密关系动机与更频繁的攻击有关。强有力的权力-性别关联也预测了女性，但只有当亲密关系的动机很高。
The present study investigated whether implicit social motives and cognitive power–sex associations would predict self-reports of aggressive sexual behavior. Participants wrote stories in response to Thematic Apperception Test pictures, which were scored for power and affiliation–intimacy motives. They also completed a lexical-decision priming task that provided an index of the strength of the cognitive association between the concepts of “power” and “sexuality.” For men, high levels of power motivation and strong power–sex associations predicted more frequent aggression. There was also an interaction: Power motivation was unrelated to aggression for men with the weakest power–sex associations. For women, high levels of affiliation–intimacy motivation were associated with more frequent aggression. Strong power–sex associations were also predictive for women but only when affiliation–intimacy motivation was high.