Life expectancy after cervical en bloc laminoplasty: Analysis of data following more than 20 years. Spine.
Life expectancy after cervical en bloc laminoplasty: Analysis of data following more than 20 years. Spine.
复制标题
宫颈整块椎管扩大成形术后的预期寿命:20 多年的数据分析。
DOI:
10.1097/brs.0000000000001843
复制
发表时间:
2017
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Kimura T
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Kawaguchi Y;Nakano M;Yasuda T;Seki S;Hori T;Suzuki K;Makino H;Kimura T
Study Design.Case series.Objective.To clarify the following questions How long after cervical laminoplasty did the patients die? What were the causes of the death? Was the severity of the neurological dysfunction related to early death?Summary of Background Data.Life expectancy in patients with cervical myelopathy is unclear. Cervical laminoplasty was performed in 216 patients between 1981 and 1994. It was possible to follow 148 patients for more than 20 years. We used the data of the 68 survivors and the 80 patients had already died.Methods.As for the patients who died by the final follow-up, the survival rate was analyzed by a Kaplan-Meier plot; the results were compared between the patients with cervical spondylosis (CS) and the patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). The causes of the death were assessed. The neurological evaluation was graded using the score devised by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA). The pre-and postoperative scores were compared between the patients in the died group (D group) and the surviving patients group (S group).Results.The mean period from surgery to death was 13.4±7.4 years. There was no difference in the survival rate between patients with CS and patients with OPLL. The most frequent cause of death was malignant tumor followed by ischemic heart disease. Preoperative JOA score in the D group was lower than that in the S group. There was no statistical difference in postoperative JOA score between the two groups.Conclusion.The patients who underwent cervical laminoplasty caused by compression myelopathy due to CS and OPLL had a long life expectancy, averaging more than 13 years. Life expectancy did not differ between patients with CS and patients with OPLL. Neurological deficit did not directly affect the life expectancy.Level of Evidence: 4The life expectancy in patients with cervical myelopathy remains unclarified, despite a study which has shown that the life expectancy in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) is significantly lower than that in normal subjects. 1 The length of life expectancy depends on the level and grade of SCI. 1 Patients with SCI tend to have complications, such as septicemia due to pneumonia, urinary tract infection, and pressure sores. In addition, their vital organs may dysfunction due to inactivity of the motor system. Cervical myelopathy caused by cervical spondylosis (CS) and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) is generally a chronic dysfunction of the spinal cord. A previous article has demonstrated that the cumulative survival rate of patients with severe cervical myelopathy is less than that in patients with slight or moderate myelopathy. 2 In our recent study, we analyzed the surgical outcomes of en bloc cervical laminoplasty in a follow-up of more than 20 years. 3 These data on the surviving patients and the patients who died could be applied to the current analysis. The present study was undertaken to clarify the following points using the comparative data of surviving patients and patients who died after cervical laminoplasty: the length of survival after cervical laminoplasty, the cause of death, and the relation of the severity of neurological dysfunction and early death.MATERIALS AND METHODSFor the treatment of cervical compressive myelopathy due to CS or OPLL, 216 patients underwent en bloc cervical laminoplasty between 1981 and 1994 at our university hospital. The clinical diagnosis was made based on physical examination, plain radiography, computed tomography, myelography, and magnetic resonance imaging. The present study was carried out using data only from patients with CS or …