Offline Secondary Electron Counting and Conditional Re-illumination in SEM
Offline Secondary Electron Counting and Conditional Re-illumination in SEM
复制标题
SEM 中的离线二次电子计数和条件重照明
DOI:
10.1017/s1431927620017249
复制
发表时间:
2020
影响因子:
2.8
通讯作者:
Berggren, Karl
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Agarwal, Akshay;Simonaitis, John;Goyal, Vivek;Berggren, Karl
Adaptive illumination schemes have recently been implemented in scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to mitigate sample damage during imaging [1, 2]. In such schemes, the sample is imaged by illuminating only a fraction of the sample pixels. In STEM, a major enabling factor for these schemes has been the implementation of electron count imaging [3]. We had recently proposed an adaptive scheme called conditional re-illumination (CR) that can significantly reduce sample damage by using scattered electron counting on a STEM or secondary electron (SE) counting in SEM [4]. However, SE counting is not commonly available on an SEM which limits the implementation of this scheme.In this work, we have implemented SE count imaging and CR offline on an SEM (Zeiss Leo 1525). To implement SE counting, we collected the SE detector signal on a 2 GHz oscilloscope and verified through a study of its statistics that each detected SE corresponded to one signal pulse [5, 6]. We collected 32 image frames at a pixel resolution of 262 by 188 pixels, beam current of 2 pA, beam energy of 10 kV, and a pixel dwell time of 440 ns. Each image frame had the SEM scan waveform and the in-lens and in-chamber SE detector signal with the same time axis. We wrote code to segment the detector signal into pixels, count the number of SEs in each pixel, and create a reference image using counts from both detectors and all frames. To implement CR our code looked at the number of SEs (hereafter referred to as NSE-limited CR) or the number of illuminations (hereafter referred to as M-limited CR) after every frame. For the M-limited scheme, if the number of illuminations crossed a maximum threshold, we did not use the counts from the following frames. For the NSE-limited scheme, if the number of SEs for a pixel crossed a maximum threshold, we did not use SE counts for that pixel in the following frames. Therefore, the incident electron dose per pixel was uniformly distributed over all pixels for the M-limited scheme and non-uniformly distributed for the NSE-limited scheme. To compare the CR images to the reference SE count image, our code scaled the SE counts for each pixel in the CR images by the ratio of the maximum number of frames (32) to the number of frames used at that pixel in the CR image. We used two metrics to quantify the comparison between CR images–Thong’s signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR)[7] and mean absolute relative error (MARE)[8] which is the mean of the absolute value of the difference between the CR image and the reference image, expressed as a fraction of the mean of the reference image.
影响因子:
2.9
作者:
Agarwal, Akshay;Berggren, Karl K.;van Staaden, Yuri J.;Goyal, Vivek K.
通讯作者:
Goyal, Vivek K.