Progress in the establishment and strengthening of national immunization technical advisory groups: Analysis from the 2013 WHO/UNICEF joint reporting form, data for 2012
Progress in the establishment and strengthening of national immunization technical advisory groups: Analysis from the 2013 WHO/UNICEF joint reporting form, data for 2012
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.08.084
复制
发表时间：
2013-11-04
期刊：
影响因子：
5.5
通讯作者：
Oeztuerkh, Murat Hakan
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Duclos, Philippe;Dumolard, Laure;Oeztuerkh, Murat Hakan
大多数工业化国家和一些发展中国家都建立了国家免疫技术咨询小组。为了能够对NITAG的存在和功能进行系统的全球监测，2011年，世卫组织和联合国儿童基金会在世卫组织/联合国儿童基金会联合报告表（JRF）中纳入了相关问题，该表为全球收集免疫规划绩效指标提供了官方手段。根据对2013年联合成果框架的分析，2012年的数据显示，2010年至2012年取得了显著进展，截至2012年底，99个国家（52%）报告说，有一个具有正式立法或行政基础的国家技术援助小组（在东地中海地区高达86%- EMR），有63个（33%）国家的NITAG符合六项进程指标（比2010年报告的43个国家增加了47%），包括总共38个发展中国家。11%的低收入国家报告NITAG符合所有六个过程标准，而中等收入国家为29%，高收入国家为57%。人口较少的国家报告说，与人口较多的国家相比，NITAG符合所有六项流程标准的频率较低（人口较少的国家为23%，人口较多的国家为43%）。GVAP是促进NITAG制度化的重大机遇。需要探索一种特殊的办法，使小国能够从分区域或其他国家咨询小组中受益。(C)2013作者由爱思唯尔有限公司出版。保留所有权利。
The majority of industrialized and some developing countries have established National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups (NITAGs). To enable systematic global monitoring of the existence and functionality of NITAGs, in 2011, WHO and UNICEF included related questions in the WHO/UNICEF Joint Reporting Form (JRF) that provides an official means to globally collect indicators of immunization program performance. These questions relate to six basic process indicators.According to the analysis of the 2013 JRF, data for 2012, notable progress was achieved between 2010 and 2012 and by the end of 2012, 99 countries (52%) reported the existence of a NITAG with a formal legislative or administrative basis (with a high of 86% in the Eastern Mediterranean Region - EMR), among the countries that reported data in the NITAG section of the JRF.There were 63 (33%) countries with a NITAG that met six process indicators (47% increase over the 43 reported in 2010) including a total of 38 developing countries. 11% of low income countries reported a NITAG that meets all six process criteria, versus 29% of middle income countries and 57% of the high income ones. Countries with smaller populations reported the existence of a NITAG that meets all six process criteria less frequently than more populated countries (23% for less populated countries versus 43% for more populated ones).However, progress needs to be accelerated to reach the Global Vaccine Action Plan (GVAP) target of ensuring all countries have support from a NITAG. The GVAP represents a major opportunity to boost the institutionalization of NITAGs. A special approach needs to be explored to allow small countries to benefit from sub-regional or other countries advisory groups. (C) 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.