From "satisfaction of search" to "subsequent search misses": a review of multiple-target search errors across radiology and cognitive science.

From "satisfaction of search" to "subsequent search misses": a review of multiple-target search errors across radiology and cognitive science.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1186/s41235-021-00318-w
复制
发表时间:
2021-08-28
期刊:
Cognitive research: principles and implications
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Schmidt J
Schmidt J
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Adamo SH;Gereke BJ;Shomstein S;Schmidt J

文献摘要

参考文献

相似文献

50多年来,放射学领域一直在研究搜索效果的满意度。定义为当在图像内发现初始目标时后续目标的检测率的降低,已知这些多目标误差是遗漏误差的基础(例如,如果识别出另一个异常,则放射科医师更有可能错过一个异常)。最近,它们也被发现是认知科学实验中基于实验室的搜索错误的基础(例如,如果检测到不同的目标“T”,则观察者更有可能错过目标“T”)。这种现象在认知科学中被重新命名为后续搜索失误(SSM)效应。在这里,我们回顾了放射学和认知科学中的SSM文献,并讨论:(1)当前的SSM理论(即,满意度,知觉集,和资源消耗理论),(2)眼动误差的基础SSM效果,(3)现有的努力测试,以减轻SSM错误,和(4)的演变的方法和分析时使用的计算SSM效果。最后,我们提出了注意模板理论,一个新的机制解释SSM错误,它结合了我们目前的理解SSM错误和注意模板文献。
For over 50 years, the satisfaction of search effect has been studied within the field of radiology. Defined as a decrease in detection rates for a subsequent target when an initial target is found within the image, these multiple target errors are known to underlie errors of omission (e.g., a radiologist is more likely to miss an abnormality if another abnormality is identified). More recently, they have also been found to underlie lab-based search errors in cognitive science experiments (e.g., an observer is more likely to miss a target ‘T’ if a different target ‘T’ was detected). This phenomenon was renamed the subsequent search miss (SSM) effect in cognitive science. Here we review the SSM literature in both radiology and cognitive science and discuss: (1) the current SSM theories (i.e., satisfaction, perceptual set, and resource depletion theories), (2) the eye movement errors that underlie the SSM effect, (3) the existing efforts tested to alleviate SSM errors, and (4) the evolution of methodologies and analyses used when calculating the SSM effect. Finally, we present the attentional template theory, a novel mechanistic explanation for SSM errors, which ties together our current understanding of SSM errors and the attentional template literature.
DOI: 10.3758/s13414-020-02085-0
发表时间: 2020-10
期刊: Attention, perception & psychophysics
影响因子: --
作者:
Becker MW;Anderson K;Brascamp JW
通讯作者: Brascamp JW
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2005.11.032
发表时间: 2006-03-01
期刊: ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY
影响因子: 4.8
作者:
Berbaum, K;Franken, EA;Schartz, KM
通讯作者: Schartz, KM
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2007.06.001
发表时间: 2007-09-01
期刊: ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY
影响因子: 4.8
作者:
Berbaum, Kevin S.;Caldwell, Robert T.;Franken, A., Jr.
通讯作者: Franken, A., Jr.
DOI: 10.3758/s13414-019-01802-8
发表时间: 2019-11-01
影响因子: 1.7
作者:
Adamo, Stephen H.;Cox, Patrick H.;Mitroff, Stephen R.
通讯作者: Mitroff, Stephen R.
DOI: 10.1016/s1076-6332(00)80063-x
发表时间: 2000-12-01
期刊: ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY
影响因子: 4.8
作者:
Berbaum, KS;Franken, EA;Krupinski, EA
通讯作者: Krupinski, EA