Gender equality and the governance of long-term care policy: new comparative models and paradigms

Gender equality and the governance of long-term care policy: new comparative models and paradigms
复制标题

性别平等与长期护理政策的治理:新的比较模型和范式

DOI:
10.1017/ics.2020.16
复制
发表时间:
2020
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Rummery K
Rummery K
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Rummery K

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

护理政策与性别平等成果之间存在着长期的联系,福利国家类型学的许多模型都将提供护理视为一个显著特征。然而,迄今为止,很少有研究通过审查政策及其运作方式、它们如何以及为何影响性别平等以及护理政策的治理来系统地、批判性地审查这些联系。比较的方式。本文借鉴了最近完成的一项关于长期护理和性别平等的比较研究的证据。CQA的采用了(比较定性分析)方法来确定案例研究,并进行了进一步分析,重点是:总体而言,政策及其运作方式如何实现两性平等;导致良好两性平等成果的政策管理和设计;决策水平;国家、家庭、社区和非法定民间部门在设计和执行有效政策方面的作用;以及支持政策的想法、行为者和机构在多大程度上具有特定背景。作者没有使用现有的不受性别平等驱动的福利类型作为定义结果变量,而是采用归纳法进行政策分析,根据性别平等结果比较政策结果。她设计了两种新的长期护理政策模式:通用模式和伙伴关系模式,这两种模式都以不同的方式改善了性别平等。本文最后指出,需要超越现有的福利国家类型在审查性别平等的成果,这将导致新的模式,如这里所描述的。
There is a long-established link between care policies and gender equality outcomes, and much modelling of welfare state typologies look at care provision as a distinguishing feature. However, to date, little research has been done which has systematically and critically examined those links by examining the policies and the way they operate, how and why they affect gender equality, and the governance of care policies in a comparative way. This paper draws on evidence from a recently completed comparative study looking at long-term care and gender equality. A CQA (Comparative Qualitative Analysis) approach was used to identify case studies, and further analysis carried out which focussed on: overall, how the policies and the way they operated to achieve gender equality; the governance and design of policies that led to good gender equality outcomes; the level of policy making; the role of the state, the family, the community and the nonstatutory civic sector in designing and delivering effective policies; and how context specific the ideas, actors and institutions supporting the policies were. Instead of using existing welfare typologies that were not driven by gender equality as the defining outcome variable, the author takes an inductive approach to policy analysis to compare policy outcomes according to gender equity outcomes. She devises two new models of long-term care policy: the Universal Model and the Partnership Model, both of which lead to improved gender equality in different ways. This paper concludes by noting the need to move beyond existing welfare state typologies in examining gender equality outcomes, which will result in new models as depicted here.
制定北欧儿童保育政策——政治进程和议程
DOI: --
发表时间: 2012
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
T. Rostgaard;G. Eydal
通讯作者: G. Eydal
不完整的革命:适应女性的新角色
DOI: --
发表时间: 2009
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
G. Esping
通讯作者: G. Esping
DOI: --
发表时间: 2006
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Helen Sullivan
通讯作者: Helen Sullivan
平衡多元化:照顾老年人的新福利组合
DOI: --
发表时间: 1993
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
A. Evers;Ivan Svetlik
通讯作者: Ivan Svetlik
冰岛老年人的非正式和正式护理。
DOI: --
发表时间: 2014
影响因子: 1.9
作者:
Sigurveig H Sigurdardottir;I. Kåreholt
通讯作者: I. Kåreholt