Functional evolution of the feeding system in rodents.
Functional evolution of the feeding system in rodents.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0036299
复制
发表时间:
2012
期刊:
影响因子:
3.7
通讯作者:
Jeffery N
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Cox PG;Rayfield EJ;Fagan MJ;Herrel A;Pataky TC;Jeffery N
The masticatory musculature of rodents has evolved to enable both gnawing at the incisors and chewing at the molars. In particular, the masseter muscle is highly specialised, having extended anteriorly to originate from the rostrum. All living rodents have achieved this masseteric expansion in one of three ways, known as the sciuromorph, hystricomorph and myomorph conditions. Here, we used finite element analysis (FEA) to investigate the biomechanical implications of these three morphologies, in a squirrel, guinea pig and rat. In particular, we wished to determine whether each of the three morphologies is better adapted for either gnawing or chewing. Results show that squirrels are more efficient at muscle-bite force transmission during incisor gnawing than guinea pigs, and that guinea pigs are more efficient at molar chewing than squirrels. This matches the known diet of nuts and seeds that squirrels gnaw, and of grasses that guinea pigs grind down with their molars. Surprisingly, results also indicate that rats are more efficient as well as more versatile feeders than both the squirrel and guinea pig. There seems to be no compromise in biting efficiency to accommodate the wider range of foodstuffs and the more general feeding behaviour adopted by rats. Our results show that the morphology of the skull and masticatory muscles have allowed squirrels to specialise as gnawers and guinea pigs as chewers, but that rats are high-performance generalists, which helps explain their overwhelming success as a group.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.1111/j.1096-3642.1971.tb00754.x
发表时间:
1971-01-01
影响因子:
2.8
作者:
HIIEMAE, K
通讯作者:
HIIEMAE, K
影响因子:
2.8
作者:
Eng, C. M.;Ward, S. R.;Taylor, A. B.
通讯作者:
Taylor, A. B.
DOI:
10.1002/ar.21358
发表时间:
2011-04-01
影响因子:
2
作者:
Bright, Jen A.;Rayfield, Emily J.
通讯作者:
Rayfield, Emily J.
影响因子:
4.1
作者:
Adkins, RM;Walton, AH;Honeycutt, RL
通讯作者:
Honeycutt, RL
影响因子:
10.7
作者:
Huchon, D;Madsen, O;Douzery, EJP
通讯作者:
Douzery, EJP