Quo vadis grammaticalization theory? Why complex language change is like words
Quo vadis grammaticalization theory? Why complex language change is like words
复制标题
语法化理论何去何从？
DOI：
10.1515/flin.2014.015
复制
发表时间：
2014
影响因子：
0.6
通讯作者：
B. Wiemer
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
B. Wiemer
本文论述了语言变化的结构方面，这些方面被归因于语法化，并被不同的描述所默许：(1)复杂变化的动机，(2)语言接触的作用，(3)试图创造语言类型和汇聚区的区域轮廓。我们讨论了全面而统一地处理变化的一些前提条件，在这种情况下，语法化不会成为语法变化的任何概念。从重新考虑莱曼的参数及其在文献中的处理开始，我们首先解决与基于原型(或核对表)的帐户有关的问题。更详细地分析了属于组合轴的参数。即使参数可以在基于原型的方法中进行排序，但这种方法被证明不足以阐明连贯的理论。另一种选择可能在于应用以相对话语突出度为基础的上位原则(连同常规化)。本文探讨了这两种方法的优缺点，认为它们应该作为连贯的语法化理论的补充部分加以运用，但这一理论尚未详细阐述。
Abstract The article addresses structural aspects of language change which have been ascribed to grammaticalization and have tacitly been presupposed by diverse accounts (i) of the motives of complex changes, (ii) of the role of language contact, and (iii) by attempts to create areal profiles of language types and zones of convergence. We discuss some of the preconditions for a comprehensive and yet unified treatment of changes in which grammaticalization would not become an anythinggoes concept of grammatical change. Starting from a reconsideration of Lehmann’s parameters and their treatment in the literature, we first address problems connected to accounts based on prototypes (or checklists). Parameters belonging to the syntagmatic axis are analyzed in more detail. Even though parameters may be ranked within prototype-based approaches, such an approach is shown to be insufficient in articulating a coherent theory. An alternative might consist in the application of a superordinate principle based on relative discourse prominence (together with conventionalization). The advantages and drawbacks of both approaches are investigated, and it is argued that they should be employed as complementary parts of a coherent grammaticalization theory that is yet to be detailed.
影响因子：
3.6
作者：
Sudha Bhingardive;Ramkrishna Bairi
通讯作者：
Sudha Bhingardive;Ramkrishna Bairi
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2021
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
Heiko Narrog and Bernd Heine
通讯作者：
Heiko Narrog and Bernd Heine