EVALUATION OF SIX MOSQUITO TRAPS FOR COLLECTION OF AEDES ALBOPICTUS AND ASSOCIATED MOSQUITO SPECIES IN A SUBURBAN SETTING IN NORTH CENTRAL FLORIDA
EVALUATION OF SIX MOSQUITO TRAPS FOR COLLECTION OF AEDES ALBOPICTUS AND ASSOCIATED MOSQUITO SPECIES IN A SUBURBAN SETTING IN NORTH CENTRAL FLORIDA
复制标题
DOI：
10.2987/08-5800.1
复制
发表时间：
2009-03-01
影响因子：
1
通讯作者：
Allan, S. A.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Hoel, D. F.;Kline, D. L.;Allan, S. A.
我们比较了6个成年捕蚊器在郊区后院收集白纹伊蚊的有效性，目的是找到一个更合适的监测替代疾病控制和预防中心（CDC）的光陷阱。捕集器选择包括2个商业丙烷捕集器（Moscow Magnet（TM）Professional捕集器和Moscow Magnet Liberty捕集器）。2个Aedes特异性诱捕器（Fay-Prince全向诱捕器和Wilton诱捕器），1个实验诱捕器（Moscow Magnet-X诱捕器）和一个标准监测CDC光诱捕器（用作对照）。为不产生二氧化碳的陷阱提供瓶装CO，流速为500 ml/min。这些设计用于化学引诱剂（蚊子磁铁陷阱）的陷阱用Lurex（TM）（L-乳酸）和辛烯醇（1-辛烯-3-醇）商业诱饵（已知的Ae引诱剂）作为诱饵。白纹伊蚊重复三次6 × 6拉丁方试验，总共产生37，237只蚊子。其中5，280例（14.2%）为Ae。白纹伊蚊Ae.从实验和商业诱捕器中收集到的白纹伊蚊数量（4，244/5，280; 80.3%）高于CDC灯诱捕器和Aedes专用诱捕器。Moscow Magnet Liberty收集了最多的Ae。albopictus（1，591），占总收入的30.1%，其次是Moscow Magnet-X（1，468）和Moscow Magnet Pro（1，185）。全方位Fay-Prince捕集器的性能优于CDC或Wilton捕集器。在这些试验中收集了27种蚊子，其中9种数量足够大，可以进行有意义的分析。白纹伊蚊是第二常见的被捕获蚊子。这些试验的结果表明，丙烷动力的商业陷阱将作为有用的替代品，在Ae的CDC陷阱。白纹伊蚊监测工作。陷阱功能有利于收集Ae。白纹伊蚊和其他蚊子物种进行了讨论。
We compared 6 adult mosquito traps for effectiveness in collecting Aedes albopictus from Suburban backyards with the goal of finding a more suitable surveillance replacement for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) light trap. Trap selection included 2 commercial propane traps (Mosquito Magnet(TM) Professional trap and Mosquito Magnet Liberty trap). 2 Aedes-specific traps (Fay-Prince Omnidirectional trap and Wilton trap), I experimental trap (Mosquito Magnet-X trap), and a standard surveillance CDC light trap that served as a control. Traps that did not generate carbon dioxide were provided with bottled CO, at a flow rate of 500 ml/min. Those traps designed for use with chemical attractants (Mosquito Magnet traps) were baited with Lurex(TM) (L-lactic acid) and octenol (1-octen-3-ol) commercial baits, known attractants to Ae. albopictus. Three repetitions of a 6 X 6 Latin square test yielded a total of 37,237 mosquitoes. of which 5,280 (14.2%) were Ae. albopictus. Significantly more (P < 0.05) Ae. albopictus were collected from the experimental and commercial traps (4,244/5,280; 80.3%) than from the CDC light trap and Aedes-specific traps. The Mosquito Magnet Liberty collected the most Ae. albopictus (1,591), accounting for 30.1% of the total take, followed closely by the Mosquito Magnet-X (1,468) and the Mosquito Magnet Pro (1,185). The omnidirectional Fay-Prince trap performed better than the CDC or Wilton trap. Twenty-seven mosquito species were collected during these trials, 9 species in large enough numbers for meaningful analysis. Aedes albopictus was the second most common mosquito trapped. The results of these trials indicate that propane-powered commercial traps would serve as useful substitutes in lieu of CDC traps in Ae. albopictus surveillance efforts. Trap features advantageous for collecting Ae. albopictus and other mosquito species are discussed.