The conditional process model of mindfulness and emotion regulation: An empirical test.
The conditional process model of mindfulness and emotion regulation: An empirical test.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.jad.2017.01.027
复制
发表时间：
2017-04-01
影响因子：
6.6
通讯作者：
Hofmann SG
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Curtiss J;Klemanski DH;Andrews L;Ito M;Hofmann SG
正念和情绪调节的条件过程模型（CPM）假设特定的中介者和调节者将这些结构与心理健康结果联系起来。目前的研究经验性地检查了CPM的中心原则，即无反应性通过认知情绪调节策略调节情绪障碍症状的间接观察效果。来自日本的临床样本（n=1667）完成了一组自我报告工具。几个路径分析，以确定是否认知情绪调节策略介导的观察和个人情绪障碍的症状之间的关系，并确定无反应性是否缓和这些间接影响。提供的结果支持CPM。具体而言，无反应性缓和的间接影响观察症状通过重新评估，但它没有缓和的间接影响观察症状通过抑制。因果关系的解释是有限的，必须承认的日本样本的文化因素。这些结果强调了潜在的重要性，无反应性和情绪调节作为干预的目标。
The conditional process model (CPM) of mindfulness and emotion regulation posits that specific mediators and moderators link these constructs to mental health outcomes. The current study empirically examined the central tenets of the CPM, which posit that nonreactivity moderates the indirect effect of observation on symptoms of emotional disorders through cognitive emotion regulation strategies. A clinical sample (n=1667) of individuals from Japan completed a battery of self-report instruments. Several path analyses were conducted to determine whether cognitive emotion regulation strategies mediate the relationship between observation and symptoms of individual emotional disorders, and to determine whether nonreactivity moderated these indirect effects. Results provided support the CPM. Specifically, nonreactivity moderated the indirect effect of observation on symptoms through reappraisal, but it did not moderate the indirect effect of observation on symptoms through suppression. Causal interpretations are limited, and cultural considerations must be acknowledged given the Japanese sample These results underscore the potential importance of nonreactivity and emotion regulation as targets for interventions.