Could psoralen plus ultraviolet A1 ('PUVA1') work? Depth penetration achieved by phototherapy lamps.
Could psoralen plus ultraviolet A1 ('PUVA1') work? Depth penetration achieved by phototherapy lamps.
复制标题
补骨脂素加紫外线 A1(“PUVA1”)有效吗?
DOI:
10.1111/bjd.18561
复制
发表时间:
2020
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Barnard IRM
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Barnard IRM
DEAR EDITOR, Psoralen and ultraviolet A (PUVA) is useful in treating various hand and foot skin diseases. 1 Most cases of psoriasis respond well to phototherapy or PUVA. However, for some diseases, such as palmoplantar pustular psoriasis, PUVA is not always sufficient to produce therapeutic effect. If PUVA fails, it is sometimes necessary to progress to other treatments such as Grenz ray therapy (where available), 2 systemic retinoid or systemic immunosuppression. Could ‘PUVA1’(psoralen combined with ultraviolet A1 long-wavelength UVA) work in cases where conventional PUVA (psoralen plus broadband UVA) has been inadequate? Previous in vitro and in vivo work has indicated that longer UVA wavelengths can activate psoralen and induce erythema. 3, 4 Combine this with the fact that longer UV wavelengths penetrate deeper into tissue (this is probably why UVA1 monotherapy might work in palmoplantar pustulosis5), and a potential result is that psoralen plus a UVA1 source might be more effective than the standard broadband UVA source in treating conditions that affect sites with a thick epidermis, such as palms and soles of feet. We wanted to determine if PUVA1 might be a useful treatment, before deciding whether or not a pilot clinical study would be appropriate. Monte Carlo radiative transfer (MCRT) methods use localized scattering and absorption probabilities to describe the path of photon packets through a medium, and are ideally suited to modelling a complex structure such as the upper layers of the skin. 6 These computationally intensive methods rely on repeated random sampling to form predictive models of radiation transport through a scattering medium, such as the skin. 7 MCRT methods are widely used and rely on published optical properties of the tissue. Using a modified version of a previously published five-layered MCRT skin model, 8 irradiation by several phototherapy light sources [metal halide UVA1, fluorescent lamp UVA1, broadband UVA (‘PUVA tubes’) and narrowband UVB (a standard phototherapy)] was simulated. Four simulations were performed, one for each light source, and each simulation was run with 100 million photon packets, to achieve statistically significant results. The total fluence, at depth, achieved by each light source is recovered. The four simulations were repeated for psoriatic skin, achieved by thickening the modelled stratum corneum (the epidermal keratin layer) by a factor of two. The results of our simulations quantify the depth penetration advantage achieved by UVA1 (both fluorescent and metal halide lamps) over that achieved by broadband UVA and narrowband UVB. The advantage is smaller at 50% of incident fluence, but larger when considering the depth of 10% of the fluence (Table 1). In addition, we found that psoriatic tissue greatly reduced the depth achieved by all lamps–the stratum corneum strongly scatters and absorbs UV radiation, so