Decision-Making While Passing and Visual Search Strategy During Ball Receiving in Team Sport Play

Decision-Making While Passing and Visual Search Strategy During Ball Receiving in Team Sport Play
复制标题

DOI:
10.1177/0031512519900057
复制
发表时间:
2020-01-21
影响因子:
1.6
通讯作者:
Asai, Takeshi
Asai, Takeshi
中科院分区:
心理学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Natsuhara, Takayuki;Kato, Takaaki;Asai, Takeshi

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

在许多团队运动中,环境不断变化,运动员有选择地在接近的球和其他球员之间分配注意力,并不断地做出关于将球传给谁的决定。以前关于足球等团队运动决策的研究很少包括接球阶段。这项研究考察了球员在传球决策过程中的视觉搜索策略。使用之前录制的真实场景中的五对四足球特定电影模拟,高级球员(HLP)和中级球员(MLP)对真人大小的足球场景做出反应。我们测量了他们在接球和传球执行等决策任务中的视觉搜索策略,并收集了他们的口头报告。我们采用了一种新颖的系统,其中根据视频片段将球弹向参与者,以便在任务期间保持知觉-动作耦合。我们发现,在决策准确性、眼动数据和口头报告方面,存在基于技能的差异。HLP表现出比MLP更好的决策,在眼动数据中,HLP将更多的注意力分配给非盯防攻击者([M]=14.1,[SD]=4.8%,P<.001,ETA(2)=0.39),接受传球的队友(M=18.4,SD=4.3%,P<0.05,ETA(2)=0.15),以及对手(M=14.6,SD=6.3%,P<.05,ETA(2)=0.17)。此外,根据口头报告,HLP倾向于关注对手球员的信息。因此,在接球时的视觉搜索策略表明,队友和对手的位置和情况是做出准确和一致的传球决定的最重要的信息来源。
In many team sports, in which environmental change is constant, athletes selectively allocate attention between the approaching ball and other players, and constantly consistently making decisions regarding whom to pass the ball to. Few previous studies on decision-making in team sports such as soccer have included the ball reception phase. This study examined players' visual search strategies during pass decisions. Using five-on-four soccer-specific film simulations from previously recorded real scenes, high-level players (HLPs) and middle-level players (MLPs) reacted to life-sized soccer scenes. We measured their visual search strategies in decision-making tasks involving ball reception and pass execution and collected their verbal reports. We employed a novel system wherein the ball is ejected toward participants according to the video clips in order to maintain perception-action coupling during the task. We found skill-based differences in decision-making accuracy, eye movement data, and verbal reports. HLPs demonstrated better decision-making than MLPs, and, in eye movement data, HLPs allocated more attention to nonmarked attackers ([M] = 14.1, [SD] = 4.8%, p < .001, eta(2) = 0.39), the teammate receiving the pass (M = 18.4, SD = 4.3%, p < .05, eta(2) = 0.15), and opponents (M = 14.6, SD = 6.3%, p < .05, eta(2) = 0.17) than did MLPs. Furthermore, according to verbal reports, HLPs tended to attend to information on opponent players. Thus, visual search strategies during ball reception suggest that the position and situation of teammates and opponents are the most important information sources for accurate and consistent pass decisions.