Subjects of analysis
Subjects of analysis
复制标题
分析对象
DOI：
10.4324/9780429480515
复制
发表时间：
1977
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
T. Ogden
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
T. Ogden
《分析的主体》是托马斯·奥格登的第四本书，探索了当代精神分析思想的前沿：分析师和被分析者在主体性（每个参与者的个体"我"）和主体间性（分析对的"共享"经验）的动态相互作用中的经验。移情和反移情不再被认为是有意义的（作为概念或经验），除非是相互关联的;每一个都是另一个产生和理解的背景。在讨论过程中，奥格登引入了“主体间分析第三人”的概念，试图概念化分析过程中主体与客体、移情与反移情的相互依存关系。这本书提供了一种理解和利用分析经验的关键维度的方法，这种维度很少被心理治疗师和分析师提及，在分析文献中更是很少被提及：分析师在分析环境中的普通的、每时每刻的经验，包括他对“外在生活”细节的最平凡的想法，他的强迫性沉思，白日梦，性幻想、分心、身体感觉和忧虑，等等，分析师在咨询室里的经验的这个高度个人化的、非常普通的、几乎看不见的方面，被看作是在分析关系的独特背景下，作为一个分析对象而新鲜创造出来的，因为它已经发展到分析的那一刻。太多时候，这种经验被认为是“分析师自己的东西”，必须作为无关的“心理噪音”加以过滤。对奥格登来说，分析经验的这种世俗/个人背景被看作是分析师在主体间性分析第三方面的经验的一种重要表现，分析师必须试图有意识地接近第三方面，必须学会在他的解释和其他形式的干预的形成中加以利用。
Subjects of Analysis, the fourth of Thomas Ogden's books, explores the frontier of contemporary psychoanalytic thinking: the experience of analyst and analysand in the dynamic interplay of subjectivity (the individual 'I-ness' of each participant) and intersubjectivity (the 'shared' experience of the analytic pair). No longer are transference and countertransference considered to have meaning (as concepts or as experiences) except in relation to one another; each is the context in which the other is generated and understood. In the course of this discussion, Ogden introduces the idea of the 'intersubjective analytic third' in his effort to conceptualize the interdependence of subject and object, of transference and countertransference, in the analytic process. This book offers a way of understanding and making use of a critical dimension of the analytic experience that is rarely spoken about by psychotherapists and analysts, and even less frequently written about in the analytic literature: the ordinary, moment-to-moment experience of the analyst in the analytic setting, including his most mundane thoughts about the minutiae of his 'outside life,' his obsessional ruminations, daydreams, sexual fantasies, distractedness, bodily sensations and worries, and so on. This highly personal, very ordinary, almost invisible aspect of the analyst's experience in the consulting room is viewed as having been created freshly as an analytic object in the unique context of the analytic relationship as it has developed to that moment of the analysis. Too often, this sort of experience has been dismissed as 'the analyst's own stuff' that must be filtered as extraneous 'psychological noise.' For Ogden, this mundane/personal background of analytic experience is seen as an important manifestation of the analyst's experience in the intersubjective analytic third to which the analyst must attempt to gain conscious access and must learn to utilize in the formulation of his interpretations and other forms of intervention.