Direct Selective Oxidative Cross-Coupling of Simple Alkanes with Heteroarenes
Direct Selective Oxidative Cross-Coupling of Simple Alkanes with Heteroarenes
复制标题
DOI:
10.1002/anie.201209584
复制
发表时间:
2013-01-01
影响因子:
16.6
通讯作者:
Burgmann, Lars
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Antonchick, Andrey P.;Burgmann, Lars
Aliphatic CÀH bonds are ubiquitous in organic compounds and are among the least reactive bonds. Direct and selective methods of alkane functionalization are an important and longstanding goal in chemistry.[1] Achieving selectivity by discriminating between CÀH bonds remains a challenge. Over the past decades, enormous progress has been reported for oxidative functionalization of Csp3ÀH bonds to form carbon–heteroatom bonds.[2, 3] The direct conversion of CÀH bonds into CÀC bonds by cross-coupling allows for the most efficient synthesis of products.[4, 5] Known direct methods of Csp3ÀC bond generation from two different CÀH bonds are based on the use of an oxidizing reagent and a metal catalyst.[6] These methods typically require high temperature, an excess of reagents, and are limited to cycloalkanes. The development of efficient methods of Csp3ÀH bond functionalization is highly desired. Herein, we report on the selective formation of Csp3À C bonds by cross-dehydrogenative coupling (CDC) of simple alkanes with heteroaromatic compounds using mild reaction conditions. This method allows for the selective functionalization of stronger Csp3ÀH bonds in the presence of weaker CÀH bonds at ambient temperature. As a continuation of our studies [7] on CÀH functionalization, we focused on the development of methods for CDC with simple alkanes. We began our studies by evaluating various conditions for the direct alkylation of 4, 7-dichloroquinoline (1a) with cyclohexane (2a; Table 1).[8, 9] To our delight, we found that product 3a, resulting from the direct alkylation of heteroarene 1a with simple alkane 2a, can be obtained under transition-metal-free and mild conditions at ambient temperature. Product 3a was obtained with a yield of 46% in presence of [bis (trifluoroacetoxy) iodo] benzene (PIFA) and NaN3 using benzene as the solvent (Table1, entry1). Both PIFA and NaN3 were essential for the formation of product 3a; in their absence, product 3a was not detected. In additional experiments, various solvents were tested (Table 1, entries 1–7; see also the Supporting information). The use of polar solvents led to lower yields of 3a. The best results, 72% and 67% of 3a, were obtained using dichloromethane and 1, 2-dichloroethane, respectively, as solvents. Afterwards, various oxidants were screened (Table 1, entries 8–13; see also the Supporting information). The use of [bis (trifluoroacetoxy) iodo] pentafluorobenzene or PhI (OH) OTs instead of PIFA provided access to product 3a, but with lower yields.[10] Subsequently, various additives were tested (Table 1, entries 14–16; see also the Supporting information). Whereas other additives were unsuccessful, the desired product 3a was obtained when using a metal-free source of azide, such as trimethylsilyl azide (Table1, entry14). Finally, when using an increased loading of cyclohexane (10 equiv), 3a was isolated with a yield of 85%(Table1, entry17; see also the Supporting information). Further increases in the amount of cyclohexane, and variations in the amounts of PIFA and NaN3 did not lead to significant difference in the yield of 3a. Therefore, for the