From Likert to Forced Choice: Statement Parameter Invariance and Context Effects in Personality Assessment
From Likert to Forced Choice: Statement Parameter Invariance and Context Effects in Personality Assessment
复制标题
从李克特到强制选择：人格评估中的陈述参数不变性和情境效应
DOI：
10.1080/15366367.2023.2258482
复制
发表时间：
2024
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Tan, Xuan
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Fu, Jianbin;Kyllonen, Patrick C.;Tan, Xuan
使用强迫选择问卷（FCQs）来测量人格的用户通常假设语句参数在上下文之间是不变的——在李克特和强迫选择（FC）项目之间，以及在共享一个共同语句的不同FC项目之间。在本文中，一项实证研究旨在检验这两个假设的FCQ评估测量人际和内省能力。我们比较了两种Likert形式和两种块大小为2（语句对）的FCQ形式以及五种FCQ对形式之间的常见语句参数。在五个FCQ表格中的三个中，语句只与它们在三联体块中出现过的语句配对。在其他两种FCQ形式中，语句与在三联体块中没有配对的语句配对。这种设计允许我们评估由于上下文变化而导致的语句参数变化。结果不支持Likert和FC项之间的语句参数不变性假设，也不支持在重组语句形成新项目时FC项之间的假设。但是，FC项之间的假设通常适用于通过从三元组项中删除语句而形成的对。对环境效应的来源有一些建议，但分析并不确定。研究结果对测试实践的影响进行了讨论。
Users of forced-choice questionnaires (FCQs) to measure personality commonly assume statement parameter invariance across contexts – between Likert and forced-choice (FC) items and between different FC items that share a common statement. In this paper, an empirical study was designed to check these two assumptions for an FCQ assessment measuring interpersonal and intrapersonal skills. We compared parameters of common statements between two Likert forms and two FCQ forms with a block size of two (statement pairs) and among five FCQ pair forms. In three of the five FCQ forms, statements were paired only with a statement they had appeared with in a triplet block. In the other two FCQ forms, statements were paired with statements they had not been paired with in a triplet block. This design allows us to evaluate statement parameter changes due to changes in context. The results do not support the statement parameter invariance assumption between Likert and FC items or the assumption between FC items when recombining statements form new items. However, the assumption between FC items was generally held for pairs formed by dropping a statement from a triplet item. There were some suggestions for sources of context effects, but the analyses were not definitive. Implications of the findings for test practice are discussed.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
2.7
作者：
Brown, Anna;Maydeu-Olivares, Alberto
通讯作者：
Maydeu-Olivares, Alberto
影响因子：
3.9
作者：
Griffith, Richard L.;Chmielowski, Tom;Yoshita, Yukiko
通讯作者：
Yoshita, Yukiko
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2000
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
I. Moustaki
通讯作者：
I. Moustaki
项目间多维 IRT：估计方法能走多远？
DOI：
10.3390/psych3030029
发表时间：
2021
期刊：
Psych
影响因子：
--
作者：
Mauricio Garnier;Edgar C. Merkle;Brooke E. Magnus
通讯作者：
Brooke E. Magnus
影响因子：
1.2
作者：
D. Morillo;I. Leenen;F. J. Abad;P. Hontangas;J. de la Torre;V. Ponsoda
通讯作者：
V. Ponsoda