Assessing the dynamic impact of tourism, industrialization, urbanization, and globalization on growth and environment in Southeast Asia

Assessing the dynamic impact of tourism, industrialization, urbanization, and globalization on growth and environment in Southeast Asia
复制标题

DOI:
10.1080/13504509.2016.1238021
复制
发表时间:
2017-01-01
影响因子:
5.6
通讯作者:
Lee, Jung Wan
Lee, Jung Wan
中科院分区:
环境科学与生态学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Brahmasrene, Tantatape;Lee, Jung Wan

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

本文的目的是研究东南亚的增长和环境的影响。扩展现有的研究,这项研究建立在变量,如旅游业,工业化,城市化,全球化,经济增长和环境的多元格式。运用协整检验和面板回归模型对东南亚国家的面板数据进行了实证分析。研究发现,二氧化碳排放、旅游业、工业化、城市化、全球化和经济增长之间存在长期均衡关系。因此,就短期分析而言,旅游业、城市化和全球化直接影响经济增长,而工业化则微不足道。进一步的分析显示了这些因素对环境的影响程度。结果揭示了一个有趣的悖论,即旅游业对该地区的碳排放产生负面影响,而工业化和城市化则直接导致碳排放。这些发现表明了该地区绿色或生态旅游的有效性,并强调了东南亚国家如何制定政策来遏制碳排放水平,并利用这些属性来实现可持续环境。
The purpose of this article is to investigate the impact of growth and environment in Southeast Asia. Extending existing research, this research builds on variables such as tourism, industrialization, urbanization, globalization, economic growth, and environment in a multivariate format. Cointegration tests and panel regression models are employed in the empirical analysis using panel data of Southeast Asian countries. The research discovers a long-run equilibrium relationship between carbon dioxide emissions, tourism, industrialization, urbanization, globalization, and economic growth. Accordingly, pertaining to short-run analysis, tourism, urbanization, and globalization directly affect economic growth while industrialization is insignificant. Further analysis shows the extent to which these factors impact environment. The results reveal an intriguing paradox that tourism negatively impacts carbon emissions in the region while industrialization and urbanization directly cause carbon emissions. These findings suggest the effectiveness of green or ecotourism in the region and highlight how Southeast Asian countries develop policies to curb carbon emission levels and leverage these attributes for sustainable environment.