Probation Values for the 1990s
Probation Values for the 1990s
复制标题
20 世纪 90 年代的缓刑价值
DOI：
10.1111/j.1468-2311.1995.tb00824.x
复制
发表时间：
1995
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
M. Nellis
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Nellis
重新评估缓刑价值的任务变得更加紧迫，因为就连它自己的首席督察（Chief Inspector of probation 1994，第4页）都抱怨缓刑服务（1993年）仍然“坚持其福利伦理，并没有完全将社区惩罚的概念融入到它的保留项目中”。但前进的道路并不容易。那些试图重新肯定社会工作价值（福利应该是核心）的人，反对内政部的惩罚性倾向，他们这样做时，没有考虑到这项服务的新管理文化——仁慈的社团主义——对个人关怀和关怀的表达施加的限制。“社会工作”学校也一再反常地未能利用犯罪学中的规范性辩论，这些辩论表面上与缓刑服务的未来有关。本文认为，建立在反监禁、恢复性司法和社区安全等相关概念之上的更为复杂的犯罪学价值基础，将比简单地重述“福利伦理”更好地服务于缓刑服务，并且，通过发展其作为社区司法机构的角色，为其提供一种抵制完全惩罚性身份的手段。
: The task of re-assessing probation values assumed a new urgency when even its own Chief Inspector (Chief Inspector of Probation 1994, p. 4) complained that the probation service (in 1993) was still ‘clinging to its welfare ethic and had not fully integrated the notion of punishment in the community into its repertoire’. But the way forward is not easy. Those who seek to re-affirm social work values, (to which welfare is supposed to be central), against the punitive inclinations of the Home Office, do so without regard to the limitations which the new managerial culture in the service - benevolent corporatism - imposes on the expression of personal care and concern. The ‘social work’ school have also, repeatedly and perversely, failed to draw on normative debates within criminology which have prim a facie relevance to the future of the probation service. It will be argued here that a more criminologically sophisticated value-base, built around the linked notions of anti-custodialism, restorative justice and community safety will serve the probation service better than a simple restatement of ‘the welfare ethic’, and, by developing its role as a community justice agency, provide it with a means of resisting a wholly punitive identity.