Towards a Gramscian food regime analysis of India’s agrarian crisis: Counter-movements, petrofarming and Cheap Nature
Towards a Gramscian food regime analysis of India’s agrarian crisis: Counter-movements, petrofarming and Cheap Nature
复制标题
对印度农业危机的葛兰西粮食制度分析：反运动、石油农业和廉价自然
DOI：
10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.01.015
复制
发表时间：
2018
期刊：
影响因子：
3.5
通讯作者：
Jostein Jakobsen
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Jostein Jakobsen
本文为印度持续的农业危机的葛兰西和政治生态粮食制度分析建立了一个初步框架。我根据葛兰西的观点批评波兰尼在食物体系分析中的解读，试图对食物体系分析的反运动方法提出质疑。我进一步建议，密切关注印度“实际存在的危机”案例有助于我们避免粮食制度文献中的一些以资本为中心的局限性。为了初步了解印度目前缺乏持续的小农反运动，我主张将我们的调查定位在积累危机和合法化危机的交叉点上。我将印度分散的石油农业形式分析为一种积累的社会生态循环，目前正面临廉价自然资源枯竭的状况。借鉴葛兰西的观点，我认为，一种强调整体国家中阶级力量动态的分析可以帮助我们更广泛地重新思考抵抗当代粮食制度的可能性。
This article develops an initial framework for a Gramscian and political ecological food regime analysis of India’s ongoing agrarian crisis. Criticizing readings of Polanyi in food regime analysis in light of Gramscian perspectives, I seek to contest food regime analysis’s approach to counter-movements. I suggest, further, that close attention to the Indian case of ‘actually existing crises’ helps us avoid some of the capital-centric limitations in food regime literature. Working towards an incipient understanding of the absence of a sustained smallholder counter-movement at the current conjuncture in India, I argue for locating our investigation at the intersection of crises of accumulation and of legitimation. I analyze India’s decentralized form of petrofarming as a socioecological cycle of accumulation that is presently facing a condition of exhaustion of Cheap Nature. Drawing on Gramscian perespectives, I argue that an analytics that foregrounds the dynamics of class forces in the integral state can help us rethinking the possibilities for resistance to the contemporary food regime more broadly.