On some properties of subjects and topics
On some properties of subjects and topics
复制标题
关于主题和主题的某些属性
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2005
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
L. Rizzi
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
L. Rizzi
主语和话题在解释上有某些相似之处，但这两个概念在形式、位置和界面属性上都有明显的区别。在这篇文章中，我想在短语移动的原因这一普遍问题的背景下，确定主语和话题之间的一些类比和差异。在简要讨论了“移动作为最后手段”的指导方针之后，我想谈谈与移动到主体位置有关的界面效应问题。这将导致讨论的一些解释的相似性和差异之间的主题和主题，并可能重申EPP作为一个主题标准。这种方法的后果，为运动引起的主客体不对称的分析将简要提及。文章最后分析了在意大利语中恰当使用Clitic Left Dislocation主题所必须满足的话语条件。
Subjects bear certain interpretive similarities to topics, and yet the two notions are clearly distinct, both in their formal status, position, and interface properties. In this article I would like to identify some analogies and differences between subject and topic in the context of the general issue of the causes of phrasal movement. After a brief discussion of the “movement as last resort” guidelines, I would like to address the question of the interface effects related to movement to subject position. This will lead to a discussion of some interpretive similarities and differencies between subject and topic, and to the possible restatement of the EPP as a Subject Criterion. The consequences of this approach for the analysis of subject-object asymmetries induced by movement will be briefly mentioned. The article will be concluded by an analysis of the discourse conditions which must be met for a felicitous use of Clitic Left Dislocation topics in Italian.