Performance profile of FDG-PET and PET/CT for cancer screening on the basis of a Japanese Nationwide Survey
Performance profile of FDG-PET and PET/CT for cancer screening on the basis of a Japanese Nationwide Survey
复制标题
DOI:
10.1007/s12149-007-0061-8
复制
发表时间:
2007-11-01
影响因子:
2.6
通讯作者:
Inoue, Tomio
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Minamimoto, Ryogo;Senda, Michio;Inoue, Tomio
Objective The aim of this study is to survey the situation of F-18- fl uorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG- PET) cancer screening in Japan and to describe its performance profile.Methods " FDG- PET for cancer screening" was defi ned as FDG-PET or positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET/CT) scan with or without other tests performed for cancer screening of healthy subjects. We sent questionnaires regarding FDG-PET cancer screening to 99 facilities in which FDG- PET tests were performed during the fi scal year 2005. Replies were obtained from 68 of the 99 facilities, of which 46 facilities performed FDG-PET cancer screening. The total number of subjects who underwent FDG- PET cancer screening was 50 558. From 38 of 46 facilities, reliable results of thorough examinations were obtained for the subjects who were positive by FDG-PET and/ or one or more of the combined screening tests was performed and were referred for further evaluation. The total number of subjects in these 38 facilities amounted to 43 996.Results A total of 50 558 healthy subjects underwent FDG-PET (including PET/CT) scanning with or without other tests for cancer screening in 46 PET centers during the fi scal year of 2005 in Japan. Thorough examination was indicated for 9.8% of the cases as a result of positive fi ndings suggesting possible cancer. On analyzing 43 996 cases from 38 PET centers from which detailed information was obtained, 500 cases of cancers (1.14%) were found, of which 0.90% were PET positive and 0.24% were PET negative, resulting in the relative sensitivity of PET being 79.0%. Cancers of the thyroid, colon/ rectum, lung, and breast were most frequently found (107, 102, 79, and 35 cases, respectively) with high PET sensitivity (88%, 90%, 80%, and 92%). PET showed an overall positive predictive value of 29.0%. PET/ CT had a better detection rate, sensitivity, and positive predictive value than dedicated PET (P < 0.01).Conclusions We were able to clarify the performance profi le of " FDG- PET for cancer screening" on the basis of a Japanese nationwide survey. The number of facilities possessing PET is increasing steadily, highlighting the necessity of evaluating the usefulness of " FDG- PET cancer screening" as soon as possible by undertaking long-term investigations of large series of subjects.