Antiarrhythmic drugs: electrophysiological actions.
Antiarrhythmic drugs: electrophysiological actions.
复制标题
抗心律失常药物:电生理作用。
DOI:
10.1146/annurev.pa.11.040171.001043
复制
发表时间:
1971
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
B. Hoffman
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
A. Bassett;B. Hoffman
The application of several new experimental methods to the study of the electrophysiology of the heart has resulted, over the past two decades, in a better understanding of the normal and abnormal processes that can influ ence cardiac rate and rhythm (1-4). These methods have been used by pharmacologists and others to evaluate or explain the possible or actual clinical usefulness of antiarrhythmic drugs. One approach has been to de termine the effect of a particular drug on the transmembrane action poten tials recorded from single isolated cells in preparations of cardiac tissue (2, 3). Such preparations allow the direct study of electrophysiological actions of a drug under conditions in which the tissue is removed from most neural and humoral influences. While such studies are extremely valuable, a major limitation of the microelectrode recording technique is that it may not give information on an important indirect action of a drug; for example, quini dine and procaine amide have a vagolytic action on. sinus node cells and atrial fibers in the intact animal (5). A major technical advance for in vivo studies of drug action was the development of recording and stimulating electrodes for acute and chronic implantation in the hearts of laboratory animals (6) . Their use permits a direct demonstration of normal excitation and conduction in the heart and how these properties and excitability may be altered by drug action (7, 8). There are other useful techniques which have been developed to record sequential activity of pacemaker and special ized cardiac cells (9). Another approach is to determine the effectiveness of a drug in suppressing various experimentally induced arrhythmias in labo ratory animals by monitoring the electrocardiogram and records from acutely and chronically implanted electrodes (10). Analysis of data from experiments utilizing these various methods does not guarantee that one can predict with certainty whether or not a drug will be a useful clinical agent since, for example, toxicity is not determined from such procedures. How-