Challenges to implementing urban sustainable stormwater management from a governance perspective: A literature review
Challenges to implementing urban sustainable stormwater management from a governance perspective: A literature review
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.049
复制
发表时间：
2018-09
影响因子：
11.1
通讯作者：
Xiu-Juan Qiao;Anders Kristoffersson;T. Randrup
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Xiu-Juan Qiao;Anders Kristoffersson;T. Randrup
传统的管道排水系统目前正受到气候变化和城市化的挑战，导致洪水泛滥，对人们的财产和生命造成负面影响。有人建议将可持续雨水管理作为一种替代办法，但其基础设施的实施往往仅限于示范区。治理因素是增长缓慢的主要原因之一。对44篇同行评议的论文进行了文献回顾，从治理的角度审视了这些挑战。根据参与者、资源、游戏规则和话语对确定的挑战进行了总结。领导和责任不明确、缺乏资金、缺乏关于可持续雨水管理解决方案的成本数据、缺乏空间和知识、缺乏统一的指导方针以及利益攸关方缺乏参与等挑战被认为是最突出的原因。为克服这些挑战，建议的解决办法包括：研究人员充当知识经纪人、当地利益攸关方参与社会资本、重新利用空地、建立统一的指导方针以及增加市场激励以吸引利益攸关方参与。雨水管理的治理结构分为等级共治安排、封闭共治安排和开放共治安排，开放式共治安排被认为是一种有用的治理结构。不同之处在于，后一种结构使利益攸关方参与进来，这有利于加强可持续雨水管理的实施。建议在社会经济方面进行更多的研究。这些调查结果可以提高决策者和其他相关行为者对将可持续雨水管理作为应对当前气候和城市化挑战的主要解决办法所涉及的挑战的了解。
Conventional piped drainage systems are currently being challenged by climate change and urbanization, leading to pluvial flooding, with negative consequences for people's properties and lives. Sustainable stormwater management has been suggested as an alternative, but implementation of its infrastructures is often limited to demonstration zones. Governance factors are among the main reasons for the slow pace. A literature review analyzing 44 peer-reviewed papers was conducted to examine the challenges from a governance perspective. The challenges identified were summarized based on actors, resources, rules of the game, and discourses. Challenges such as unclear leadership and responsibilities, lack of funding, lack of cost data on sustainable stormwater management solutions, lack of space and knowledge, lack of uniform guidelines, and lack of stakeholder participation were found to be the most prominent reasons. Suggested solutions to overcoming these challenges include e.g., researchers acting as knowledge brokers, the involvement of social capital among local stakeholders, re-using vacant land, establishing uniform guidelines, and increasing market incentives to engage stakeholders. The governance structures of stormwater management were categorized as hierarchical, closed and open co-governance arrangements, while open co-governance arrangement was suggested as a useful governance structure. The difference is that the latter structure engages stakeholders, which is of benefits to increased sustainable stormwater management implementation. More research on social-economical aspects is suggested. These findings can improve understanding among decision makers and other relevant actors of challenges related to implementing sustainable stormwater management as a primary solution to the current climate and urbanization challenges.