Rethinking, Reimagining, and Reigniting Community-Engaged Research to Promote Cardiovascular Health Equity.
Rethinking, Reimagining, and Reigniting Community-Engaged Research to Promote Cardiovascular Health Equity.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1161/circoutcomes.122.009519
复制
发表时间:
2022-11
影响因子:
6.9
通讯作者:
Cooper, Lisa A.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Commodore-Mensah, Yvonne;Metlock, Faith E.;Cooper, Lisa A.
States, disparities in CVD and associated risk factors exist among Black, Latino, and American Indian/Alaska Native individuals when compared with nonHispanic White individuals. 1 Social determinants of health; the context in which people are born, live, learn, work, play, worship, age; and structural factors are regarded as the root causes of CVD disparities seen in these groups. Although there is a growing body of research identifying interventions that effectively address these longstanding racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in CVD, many questions remain, and much of what we know is still not being used to change practice and policy. A growing body of knowledge also supports the notion that community-engaged research is a promising approach to promote cardiovascular health equity. Community-engaged research is an exemplary model to mitigate this challenge because it transcends limitations associated with traditional scientific research and medical care models. 2 By integrating a holistic approach, community-engaged research aims to understand individuals through a social, environmental, and cultural lens. 2 Engaging communities throughout the design and implementation of studies allows for a greater understanding of their unique context or the social determinants that influence their health. 2 Community-engaged research occurs along a continuum that can range from community outreach (eg, one-off, transactional events such as health fairs) and community consultation (eg, periodic requests for input or feedback) to communitybased participatory research (CBPR), which involves authentic relationships with reciprocity, and ultimately, to community-driven research, which includes shared leadership with researchers, decision-making at the community level, and bidirectional trust. 3 It is imperative that scientists and clinicians discontinue the common practice of taking time away from community members without giving back and rather strive to design studies that actively engage members through early inclusion, incorporation of ideas, and shared leadership, and that improve community health. 4 CBPR, an illustrious form of community-engaged research, commits to the principles of co-learning by integrating community partners throughout the research study design, implementation, and dissemination of findings. 4, 5 Despite decades of evidence supporting the value of CBPR, uptake of these priniciples and practices across the scientific community remains limited. The CBPR framework of engaging stakeholders throughout the entire research process lends to sustainable solutions for the community and health policy changes that address health disparities. 4 The foundational principles of CBPR are derived from the Northern Tradition practice of collaborative research centered on system changes and the Southern Tradition practice of emancipatory research that aims to expand research access and ownership. 5 This collaborative research approach can encompass various research designs, including experimental, nonexperimental, case studies, longitudinal, ecological, and implementation science designs. 5, 6 CBPR leverages the unique strengths of academic and community partners through a framework that (1) promotes collaborative and equitable partnerships in all research phases and