Healing Rates of Wing Punch Wounds in Free-Ranging Little Brown Myotis (Myotis lucifugus)
Healing Rates of Wing Punch Wounds in Free-Ranging Little Brown Myotis (Myotis lucifugus)
复制标题
自由放养的小棕鼠耳蝠 (Myotis lucifugus) 翅膀击伤的愈合率
DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2009
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
D. Reeder
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Kimberly N Weaver;S. Alfano;Amanda R. Kronquist;D. Reeder
Defects in the wing membranes of bats are commonly observed as a natural consequence of a membrane-wing method of flight (Davis and Doster, 1972). This type of flight remains successful not only because bats can tolerate asymmetries resulting from these injuries, but also because they can rapidly heal rips and fill in missing membranes and even sometimes fractures of the wing bones (Davis, 1968; Bogdanowicz and Urbańczyk, 1986). The wound healing process can generally be classified into three overlapping stages: an inflammatory stage, a proliferative stage, and a protracted remodeling stage. The initial inflammatory stage typically lasts up to four days, while the proliferative stage predominates from days 4–21. Only after the wound has closed upon itself can the wound healing process advance to the final, protracted remodeling stage, which can last up to two years (Kinsey et al., 2003; Christian et al., 2006). Because this process is energy-dependent, healing rates may vary by life history stage, sex, and season, and may be especially slow in immune compromised animals (Nelson and Demas, 1996; Worthington-Wilmer and Barratt, 1996; Kinsey et al., 2003; Martin et al., 2008). While much is known about the basic ecology and physiology of Myotis lucifugus (the little brown myotis), little baseline information is available regarding immune function in this or any other bat species. The primary objective of our study was to assess wound healing rates in this species. Wound healing rates can be viewed as an indicator of both immune competence and of variations in energy allocation. Additionally, because the use of sterile biopsy punches to collect tissue for DNA analysis (as originally described by Worthington-Wilmer and Barratt, 1996) has become quite common, it is important to understand how quickly the resulting wounds heal. While the rate of wound healing has not been closely monitored in M. lucifugus, previous studies in free ranging M. bechsteinii have indicated that 3 mm wounds heal in 3–4 weeks (Kerth et al., 2000, 2002). Church and Warren (1968) reported that 2 cm × 2 cm holes took approximately 24 days to heal in captive Eidolon helvum while Davis and Doster (1972), working with captive Antrozous pallidus, reported that 14 mm holes in the wings required up to 33 days to heal. Davis and Doster (1972) noted that the regenerated region often remains pale, which they and others have suggested explains the pale splotches often found on the wings of free-ranging bats. We created 3.0 mm circular wounds in the wing membranes of free-ranging M. lucifugus and monitored the healing process. Based on previous research on bats and on the general timeline of the wound healing process described from other mammals, we hypothesized that little healing would occur during the first week, but that wounds would close completely within two to three weeks. Wound healing rates in the field were assessed using cal i pers and digital photographs for later analysis with ImageJ software. A secondary objective of our study was to evaluate the reliability of these two methods. We hypothesized that the use of digital photographs would yield more accurate and precise measurements of wound area.