An alternative to grapheme-phoneme conversion rules?
An alternative to grapheme-phoneme conversion rules?
复制标题
字素-音素转换规则的替代方案？
作者：
M. Taft
当在词汇决策任务中严格控制正字法因素时，观察到正字法的相似性而不是与单词的谐音导致对非单词的反应时间增加。这一结果表明假同音字效应不是语音效应。相反，我们支持通过一组字素-字素转换规则将刺激项目的字素转换为不同的字素。当语音因素受到严格控制且正字法相似度变化时，在词汇决策任务和要求受试者说出一个项目是否与一个单词的发音相同的任务中，都提供了字素-字素规则存在的证据。即使在后一项任务中，音位重新编码的可能性得到了优化，似乎也很少使用字形-音位规则。
When orthographic factors were tightly controlled in a lexical decision task, it was observed that orthographic similarity rather than homophony with a word led to increased reaction times to nonwords. This result suggested that the pseudohomophone effect is not a phonological effect. Instead, a conversion of the graphemes of a stimulus item into different graphemes via a set of grapheme-grapheme conversion rules was supported. When phonological factors were tightly controlled and orthographic similarity varied, evidence for the existence of grapheme-grapheme rules was provided in both a lexical decision task and a task in which subjects were required to say whether an item was pronounced in the same way as a word. Even in the latter task, in which the likelihood of phonological recoding was optimized, it appeared that grapheme-phoneme rules were rarely, if ever, used.