Validation of a Nurse-Based Delirium-Screening Tool for Hospitalized Patients.

Validation of a Nurse-Based Delirium-Screening Tool for Hospitalized Patients.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.psym.2017.05.005
复制
发表时间:
2017-11
期刊:
影响因子:
3.4
通讯作者:
Douglas V
Douglas V
中科院分区:
医学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hargrave A;Bastiaens J;Bourgeois JA;Neuhaus J;Josephson SA;Chinn J;Lee M;Leung J;Douglas V

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

指南建议每天对住院患者进行谵妄监测。可用的谵妄筛查工具尚未被验证用于不同的住院患者之间的护士。我们试图验证护理谵妄筛查量表(Nu-DESC)在这些情况下。2015年8月至2016年2月进行了一项设盲横断面和质量改善研究。护士的Nu-DESC评分与精神障碍诊断和统计手册-5(DSM-5)标准的谵妄诊断进行比较。共纳入405例连续住院患者。Nu-DESC阳性(阈值评分≥2)患者与相同数量的Nu-DESC阴性患者按性别、年龄和护理单位进行匹配。护士在每12小时轮班记录每位患者的Nu-DESC评分。Nu-DESC设盲评价者连续2天对患者进行访谈。谵妄诊断由医生使用DSM-5标准应用于收集的研究数据。计算Nu-DESC的灵敏度和特异性。在一项探索性分析中,分析了Nu-DESC的性能,并增加了床旁注意力指标。Nu-DESC在阈值≥2时的灵敏度为42%(95% CI:33-53%)。特异性为98%(97- 98%)。阈值≥1时,灵敏度为67%(52- 80%),特异性为93%(90-95%)。类似的结果被发现与注意力任务。Nu-DESC是一种特异性谵妄检测工具,但在通常建议的临界点≥2时不敏感。使用≥1的阈值或增加注意力测试可增加灵敏度,但特异性略有降低。
Guidelines recommend daily delirium monitoring of hospitalized patients. Available delirium-screening tools have not been validated for use by nurses among diverse inpatients. We sought to validate the Nursing Delirium-Screening Scale (Nu-DESC) under these circumstances. A blinded cross-sectional and quality-improvement study was conducted from August 2015–February 2016. Nurses’ Nu-DESC scores were compared to delirium diagnosis according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5 (DSM-5) criteria. A total of 405 consecutive hospitalized patients were included. Nu-DESC-positive (threshold score ≥2) patients were matched with equal numbers of Nu-DESC-negative patients, by sex, age, and nursing unit. Nurses recorded a Nu-DESC score for each patient on every 12-hour shift. A Nu-DESC-blinded evaluator interviewed patients for 2 consecutive days. Delirium diagnosis was determined by physicians using DSM-5 criteria applied to collected research data. Sensitivity and specificity of the Nu-DESC were calculated. In an exploratory analysis, the performance of the Nu-DESC was analyzed with the addition of bedside measures of attention. The sensitivity of the Nu-DESC at a threshold of ≥2 was 42% (95% CI: 33–53%). Specificity was 98% (97– 98%). At a threshold of ≥1, sensitivity was 67% (52– 80%) and specificity 93% (90–95%). Similar results were found with the addition of attention tasks. The Nu-DESC is a specific delirium detection tool, but it is not sensitive at the usually proposed cut point of ≥2. Using a threshold of ≥1 or adding a test of attention increase sensitivity with a minor decrease in specificity.
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60688-1
发表时间: 2014-03-08
期刊: LANCET
影响因子: 168.9
作者:
Inouye, Sharon K.;Westendorp, Rudi G. J.;Saczynski, Jane S.
通讯作者: Saczynski, Jane S.
DOI: 10.1002/gps.1577
发表时间: 2006-09-01
影响因子: 4
作者:
de Rooij, Sophia E.;van Munster, Barbara C.;Levi, Marcel
通讯作者: Levi, Marcel
DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00073.x
发表时间: 1998-04-01
影响因子: 5.7
作者:
Inouye, SK;Rushing, JT;Pompei, P
通讯作者: Pompei, P
DOI: 10.1002/jhm.2062
发表时间: 2013-09-01
影响因子: 2.6
作者:
Douglas, Vanja C.;Hessler, Christine S.;Josephson, S. Andrew
通讯作者: Josephson, S. Andrew
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111823
发表时间: 2014
期刊: PloS one
影响因子: 3.7
作者:
Kuhn E;Du X;McGrath K;Coveney S;O'Regan N;Richardson S;Teodorczuk A;Allan L;Wilson D;Inouye SK;MacLullich AM;Meagher D;Brayne C;Timmons S;Davis D
通讯作者: Davis D