THE DEVELOPING EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH TO THE IDEA OF A BLOOD-BRAIN-BARRIER - INTRODUCTORY-REMARKS
THE DEVELOPING EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH TO THE IDEA OF A BLOOD-BRAIN-BARRIER - INTRODUCTORY-REMARKS
复制标题
DOI:
10.1111/j.1749-6632.1986.tb27146.x
复制
发表时间:
1986-12-30
影响因子:
5.2
通讯作者:
BRADBURY, MWB
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
BRADBURY, MWB
It is not always obvious to current investigators how much present thinking is the product of experimentation and ideas of the past. We truly see farther by standing on the shoulders of our predecessors. While the history of cardiovascular physiology covers more than 400 years, the idea of a blood-brain barrier is comparatively young, although approaching its 100th birthday. The idea cannot be unequivocally attributed to one person but was due to the intense interest in pharmacology in Germany at the turn of the century. The hypothesis depended on the following experimental logic. Certain compounds failed to pass from blood into brain as judged by a lack of central action or by a lack of staining of the brain. The same compounds, when injected into cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), might cause dramatic nervous symptoms or, if a dye, stain the adjacent brain or spinal cord.’p2Ehrlich3 was skeptical of the idea of a barrier at the level of the blood vessels and attributed absence of staining of the brain by intravital dyes to a lack of affinity on the part of the tissue; however, his associate Goldmann answered this explanation by his careful and detailed observations on the distribution of the acid dye trypan blue. After systemic injection into experimental animals, most tissues were heavily stained but the brain remained white and the CSF colorless. The possibility that the unstained brain was due to lack of affinity was excluded by injection of trypan blue into the subarachnoid cerebrospinal fluid: After this, spinal cord and brain tissue, adjacent to the CSF, took up the dye readily. The necessary interpretation of the two types of experiment is summarized in FIGURE 1. The blood-brain and blood-cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) barriers are best considered to be separate entities, since the cellular membranes separating blood-cerebral interstial fluid on one hand and blood-CSF on the other are anatomically different. At a given extracellular site, the relative influence of each cellular membrane must largely depend on the anatomical conditions but in general the endothelium of cerebral capillaries is likely to be the dominant factor for interstitial fluid.