Sorting the File Drawer: A Typology for Describing Unpublished Studies
Sorting the File Drawer: A Typology for Describing Unpublished Studies
复制标题
对文件抽屉进行排序：描述未发表研究的类型学
DOI：
10.1177/1745691620979831
复制
发表时间：
2021
影响因子：
12.6
通讯作者：
David A. Lishner
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
David A. Lishner
未发表研究的类型学被提出来描述各种类型的未发表研究及其未发表的原因。不发表的原因根据是否源于对研究结果的认识（结果相关原因）或不认识（结果无关原因）以及这些原因是否影响个别研究人员或审稿人/编辑的发表决定进行分类。我认为，与结果相关的原因相比，与结果无关的不发表原因不太可能将动机推理引入发表决策过程。我还认为，不发表的某些原因会产生有益的而不是有问题的发表偏见。未发表研究的类型提供了一种描述性方案，可以促进对整个心理学领域、心理学子学科或特定心理学研究领域内的研究结果群体的理解。该类型还提供了对不同出版偏见和研究传播实践的洞察，并可以指导个别研究人员组织自己的未发表研究的文件抽屉。
A typology of unpublished studies is presented to describe various types of unpublished studies and the reasons for their nonpublication. Reasons for nonpublication are classified by whether they stem from an awareness of the study results (result-dependent reasons) or not (result-independent reasons) and whether the reasons affect the publication decisions of individual researchers or reviewers/editors. I argue that result-independent reasons for nonpublication are less likely to introduce motivated reasoning into the publication decision process than are result-dependent reasons. I also argue that some reasons for nonpublication would produce beneficial as opposed to problematic publication bias. The typology of unpublished studies provides a descriptive scheme that can facilitate understanding of the population of study results across the field of psychology, within subdisciplines of psychology, or within specific psychology research domains. The typology also offers insight into different publication biases and research-dissemination practices and can guide individual researchers in organizing their own file drawers of unpublished studies.
最大限度地减少出版偏见的三个阶段。
DOI：
--
发表时间：
1990
期刊：
JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association
影响因子：
--
作者：
Chalmers,TC;Frank,CS;Reitman,D
通讯作者：
Reitman,D
影响因子：
7
作者：
Vevea, JL;Woods, CM
通讯作者：
Woods, CM