Research design: necessary bricolage

Research design: necessary bricolage
复制标题

研究设计:必要的拼凑

DOI:
10.1145/2016911.2016919
复制
发表时间:
2011
期刊:
Proceedings of the seventh international workshop on Computing education research
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
A. Robins
A. Robins
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
S. Fincher;J. Tenenberg;A. Robins

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

在本文中,我们建议,为了推进,计算机科学教育领域需要制定自己的研究方法,以增加“传统”的方法,如半结构化的采访和调查,从其他研究传统的借款。在我们最近的研究中使用的两个例子仪器进行了讨论。我们采用“拼凑”的比喻,不仅是为了解释研究人员的工作,而且是为了论证这可能是发展理论的必要步骤。
In this paper we suggest that in order to advance, the field of computer science education needs to craft its own research methods, to augment the borrowing of "traditional" methods such as semi-structured interviews and surveys from other research traditions. Two example instruments used in our recent research are discussed. We adopt the metaphor of "bricolage" to characterise not only what researchers do, but to argue that this may be a necessary step towards developing theory.