The value-added of laboratory experiments for the study of institutions and common-pool resources
The value-added of laboratory experiments for the study of institutions and common-pool resources
复制标题
实验室实验对机构和公共资源研究的增值
DOI：
10.1016/j.jebo.2005.02.008
复制
发表时间：
2006
影响因子：
2.2
通讯作者：
E. Ostrom
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
E. Ostrom
本文综述了沟通对公共资源困境中行为和结果的影响。在心肺复苏术困境中，没有非合作博弈论的通信近似预测的总结果，但允许廉价的谈话结果更高的结果。当外生规则在现实水平上被监控时，即使遵循规则会产生最佳结果，受试者也会作弊。如果有机会，实验对象将设计自己的规则系统，并对彼此施加制裁。这些研究结果补充了实地研究更复杂的资源和社区确认沟通和内生规则的形成至关重要。
This article provides an overview of the effects of communication on experimental studies of behavior and outcomes in common-pool resource (CPR) dilemmas. Aggregate outcomes in CPR dilemmas without communication approximate predictions of non-cooperative game theory, but allowing cheap talk results in higher outcomes. When exogenous rules are monitored at realistic levels, subjects cheat even though following the rule would generate optimal outcomes. If given the opportunity, experimental subjects will devise their own rule systems and impose sanctions on each other. These findings complement field research on more complex resources and communities by confirming the critical importance of communication and endogenous rule formation.