A new extraordinary means of appeal in the Polish criminal procedure: the basic principles of a fair trial and a complaint against a cassatory judgment
A new extraordinary means of appeal in the Polish criminal procedure: the basic principles of a fair trial and a complaint against a cassatory judgment
复制标题
波兰刑事诉讼中新的非常规上诉手段：公平审判和对撤销判决提出申诉的基本原则
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2023
影响因子：
0.4
通讯作者：
Tymon Markiewicz
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Adrian Zbiciak;Tymon Markiewicz
背景：本研究的主要目的是提出并评估波兰刑事诉讼中一种新的、非常规的上诉方式——从刑事诉讼原则的角度对上诉法院的撤销判决提出申诉。这包括在合理时间内审理案件、辩护权、两审程序以及申诉程序中的平等权利。
方法：本研究对波兰刑事诉讼法的条款进行了全面分析，部分基于案例研究，并将这些分析的效果与波兰宪法标准和欧洲人权法院（ECHR）的判例进行了比较。
结果：申诉程序符合公平审判的主要要求。
结论：在所讨论的诉讼程序中对被告权利的某些限制因其特殊性而完全合理，并且是相称的。这一结论适用于提交申诉的时限、只能通过辩护律师协助提出申诉的要求，以及最高法院在闭门会议上以书面形式审查申诉的方式。所有这些解决方案仅构成对所指示原则的允许的、相称的限制。这种比例性主要是由于权衡了申诉程序的好处：撤销裁决在类型上的限制、尊重上诉程序的上诉模式以及保持对撤销裁决的狭义解释理由的统一。
Background: The main purpose of this study is to present and evaluate a new, extraordinary means of appeal in Polish criminal procedure – a complaint against cassatory judgment of the appellate court from the point of view of principles of criminal proceedings. This includes hearing the case within a reasonable time, the right of defence, two-instance proceedings, and equality of arms in complaint proceedings.
Methods: This study draws on comprehensive analyses of the provisions of the Polish Code of Criminal Procedure, partly based on case research, and comparing effects of these analyses with both the Polish constitutional standard and the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR).
Results: Complaint proceedings comply with the main requirements of a fair trial.
Conclusions: Certain limitations on the right of the accused in the discussed proceedings are fully justified by their special features and are proportionate. This conclusion applies to the time-limit for submitting the complaint, the requirement to bring it only through the assistance of a defence counsel, and also to the way of examination of the complaint by the Supreme Court in writing at the closed session. All these solutions constitute only permissible, proportionate restrictions of the indicated principles. This proportionality results primarily from weighing the benefits of the complaint proceedings: limitations of cassatory adjudication in genere, respect for the appeal model of appellate proceedings, and maintaining uniformity of interpretation of narrowly defined grounds for cassatory adjudication.