Test-retest reliability of team consensus best-estimate diagnoses of axis I and II disorders in a family study.
Test-retest reliability of team consensus best-estimate diagnoses of axis I and II disorders in a family study.
复制标题
家庭研究中 I 轴和 II 轴疾病的团队共识最佳估计诊断的重测可靠性。
DOI：
10.1176/ajp.151.7.1043
复制
发表时间：
1994
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Riso,LP
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Klein,DN;Ouimette,PC;Kelly,HS;Ferro,T;Riso,LP
本研究探讨了重测信度的团队共识最佳估计诊断轴I和II disorders.MethodAs一系列的家庭研究的一部分，抑郁症和人格障碍的门诊患者，最佳估计诊断的亲属在团队诊断会议定期举行了4年以上。诊断是基于所有可用的信息，包括直接访谈，家族史数据和治疗记录，并制定明确的指导方针，以解决数据来源之间的差异。为了评估团队的最佳估计诊断的可靠性，92个亲属独立重新诊断后，2年的intervation.ResultsThe轴I和II障碍的可靠性是好到优秀。结果是相似的情况下，诊断是基于直接访谈加线人数据和诊断的情况下，线人dataalong.ConclusionsThese数据表明，团队共识最佳估计诊断方法可以始终适用，甚至在几年的时间间隔。
ObjectiveThe present study examined the test-retest reliability of team consensus best-estimate diagnoses of axis I and II disorders.MethodAs part of a series of family studies of outpatients with depressive and personality disorders, best-estimate diagnoses of relatives were derived in team diagnostic conferences held regularly over 4 years. Diagnoses were based on all available information, including direct interviews, family history data, and treatment records, and explicit guidelines were developed to resolve discrepancies between data sources. To evaluate the reliability of the team best-estimate diagnoses, 92 relatives were independently rediagnosed after a 2-year interval.ResultsThe reliability of both axis I and II disorders was good to excellent. The results were similar for cases in which diagnoses were based on direct interviews plus informant data and cases in which diagnoses were based on informant data alone.ConclusionsThese data indicate that the team consensus best-estimate diagnostic method can be applied consistently, even over an interval of several years.