CANONS AND COLONIES: THE GLOBAL TRAJECTORY OF SOCIOLOGY
CANONS AND COLONIES: THE GLOBAL TRAJECTORY OF SOCIOLOGY
复制标题
经典与殖民地：社会学的全球轨迹
DOI：
10.1590/s2178-14942019000200002
复制
发表时间：
2019
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
R. Connell
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
R. Connell
社会学作为一个知识领域的历史，特别是在英语世界，一直被学科本身的起源神话所掩盖，这种神话是以与欧洲现代性有关的“古典理论”的形式出现的。社会学从一开始就涉及帝国的世界。让正典在性别、种族甚至全球方面更具包容性，并不是一个充分的纠正。重要的社会知识类型，包括基于运动的知识和土著知识，抵制经典化。转向非殖民地和南方的观点，现在发生在整个社会科学，开辟了知识史的新视角。这些可以与劳动力集体生产知识的更复杂的观点联系起来，这些劳动力越来越多地（尽管不平等）相互作用。更有效地参与社会学的潜力出现了。
Abstract The history of sociology as a field of knowledge, especially in the English-speaking world, has been obscured by the discipline’s own origin myth in the form of a canon of “classical theory” concerned with European modernity. Sociology was involved in the world of empire from the start. Making the canon more inclusive, in gender, race, and even global terms, is not an adequate correction. Important types of social knowledge, including movement-based and indigenous knowledges, resist canonization. The turn towards decolonial and Southern perspectives, now happening across the social sciences, opens up new perspectives on the history of knowledge. These can be linked with a more sophisticated view of the collective production of knowledge by the workforces that are increasingly, though unequally, interacting. Potentials for a more effectively engaged sociology emerge.