Text4Health: Impact of Text Message Reminder-Recalls for Pediatric and Adolescent Immunizations
Text4Health: Impact of Text Message Reminder-Recalls for Pediatric and Adolescent Immunizations
复制标题
DOI：
10.2105/ajph.2011.300331
复制
发表时间：
2012-02-01
影响因子：
12.7
通讯作者：
Rickert, Vaughn I.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Stockwell, Melissa S.;Kharbanda, Elyse Olshen;Rickert, Vaughn I.
目标.我们进行了2项研究，以确定短信免疫接种者回忆的影响，在城市，低收入人群。在一项研究中，短信免疫提醒发送给随机抽样的父母（n = 195），他们的孩子年龄在11至18岁之间，需要脑膜炎球菌（MCV 4）和破伤风-白喉-无细胞百日咳（Tdap）免疫接种。我们比较了在第4、12和24周接受MCV 4或Tdap的患者与年龄和性别匹配的对照组。在另一项研究中，我们比较了收到短信和纸质提醒的父母（n = 87）和只收到纸质提醒的父母（n = 87）参加短缺后流感嗜血杆菌B（HiB）免疫召回会议的情况。在第4周时，父母进行干预的青少年接受MCV 4和Tdap中的一种或两种治疗的比例显著增加（15.4% vs 4.2%; P
Objectives. We conducted 2 studies to determine the impact of text message immunization reminder-recalls in an urban, low-income population.Methods. In 1 study, text message immunization reminders were sent to a random sample of parents (n = 195) whose children aged 11 to 18 years needed either or both meningococcal (MCV4) and tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap) immunizations. We compared receipt of MCV4 or Tdap at 4, 12, and 24 weeks with age-and gender-matched controls. In the other study, we compared attendance at a postshortage Haemophilus influenzae B (Hib) immunization recall session between parents who received text message and paper-mailed reminders (n = 87) and those who only received paper-mailed reminders (n = 87).Results. Significantly more adolescents with intervention parents received either or both MCV4 and Tdap at weeks 4 (15.4% vs 4.2%; P