Critical Discourse Analysis
Critical Discourse Analysis
复制标题
DOI：
10.4135/9781483380810.n170
复制
发表时间：
2019-09
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
S. M. Davis;Amanda Deliman;Breanya Hogue
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
S. M. Davis;Amanda Deliman;Breanya Hogue
这本书探讨了解构主义和女权主义之间的联盟，突出了这两种话语模式所采用的一些颠覆性策略，以削弱主流文化的陈词滥调。可以说，这两种类型的话语可以被解释为后现代主义的协同效应，因为它们联合起来，通过话语和其他符号学实践来揭示女性/人性、身份和性别的建构。这两种论点都涉及一些令人不安的问题，这些问题表现为特定的后现代，特别是自然的文化建设，这是解构主义和生态批评的分析。在考察近代女性主义（生态女性主义）与后现代解构主义的关系时，本书提出了一个问题，即在“主体死亡”的情况下，任何形式的女性主义话语是否可能。讽刺的是，任何女权主义话语通过其定义自己的选民-即妇女或女性气质-似乎确实持有其立场，尽管其解构性的“性别特征”。
This book investigates the alliance between deconstruction and feminism, highlighting some of the subversive strategies employed by both of these discursive modalities to undercut mainstream cultural cliches. Arguably, both types of discourse may be interpreted as synergistic effects of postmodernism, as they join forces to expose the construction of feminine/human nature, identity, and gender through discourses and other semiotic practices. Both lines of argument address some disquieting issues which present themselves as specifically postmodern, especially the cultural construction of nature, which is subjected to deconstructionist and ecocritical analysis. In examining the relation of latter-day feminisms (ecofeminism) to the postmodern project of deconstruction, this book addresses the question whether any kind of feminist discourse is possible, given the "death of the subject". Paradoxically, the very constituency through which any feminist discourse defines itself – i.e. woman or femininity – does seem to hold its position, in spite of its deconstructive "mise sous rature".