‘The Biggest Charity You’ve Never Heard of’: Institutional Logics of Charity and the State in Public Fundraising in Scotland’s NHS.
‘The Biggest Charity You’ve Never Heard of’: Institutional Logics of Charity and the State in Public Fundraising in Scotland’s NHS.
复制标题
“你从未听说过的最大慈善机构”：苏格兰国民医疗服务体系公共筹款中的慈善机构逻辑和国家。
DOI：
10.1017/s0047279421000520
复制
发表时间：
2021
影响因子：
2
通讯作者：
Kathy Dodworth
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
E. Stewart;Kathy Dodworth
NHS内国家和慈善活动之间的界限在法规中规定，但也通过地方实践颁布，模糊和争议。本文报告了对苏格兰NHS慈善机构的研究-在NHS组织内设立的慈善基金，以加强法定规定。我们分析了财务账户，并对苏格兰14个NHS慈善机构中的12个进行了定性访谈，这些慈善机构通常被称为捐赠基金。我们的研究结果表明，苏格兰的捐赠是相对富裕的慈善条款，但这种财富是不均匀的分配时，人口规模和社会经济剥夺的考虑。我们还确定了两种不同的组织决策方法，包括适当和不适当的筹款。我们认为，这些方法与对比一致的“国家”和“慈善”的制度逻辑，这反过来又意味着不同的态度，潜在的不平等，并与当地公众的关系。
The boundaries between state and charitable activities within the NHS are set out in regulations but are also enacted, blurred, and contested through local practices. This article reports research on NHS Charities– charitable funds set up within NHS organizations to enhance statutory provision – in Scotland. We analysed financial accounts and conducted qualitative interviews with staff in 12 of the 14 NHS Charities in Scotland, where they are generally known as endowments. Our findings suggest that Scotland’s endowments are relatively wealthy in charitable terms, but that this wealth is unevenly distributed when population size and socio-economic deprivation are considered. We also identify two diverging organisational approaches to decisions, including those about appropriate and inappropriate fundraising. We argue that these approaches cohere with contrasting ‘state’ and ‘charitable’ institutional logics, which in turn imply different attitudes to potential inequalities, and to relationships with local publics.
建设大社会：英国第三部门的新政策环境
影响因子：
1.5
作者：
Alcock P
通讯作者：
Alcock P