Board 134: Methods for Conducting a Scoping Literature Review on Engineering Graduate Student Mental Health (Work in Progress)
Board 134: Methods for Conducting a Scoping Literature Review on Engineering Graduate Student Mental Health (Work in Progress)
复制标题
Board 134：对工程研究生心理健康进行范围文献综述的方法（正在进行中）
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2019
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Dr. Joi
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Ms. Sarah;Jane Bork;Miss Anu Tuladhar;Dr. Joi
这篇文章的研究对象是美国人吗？是的，不确定研究生是这项研究的主要重点吗？是的，不确定学生是否在工程学科/研究领域？是的，不确定摘要是否讨论心理健康？是，不确定仅全文使用哪些心理健康关键词？任何非慢性疾病。学生们是什么学位课程的一部分？硕士，博士，研究生明确规定了哪些学科？工程这篇文章发表在哪里？任何期刊出版物。结论和未来的工作虽然他们已经通过这个项目的其他方面触及，第4阶段：图表数据和第5阶段：整理，总结和报告结果仍在进行中。目前的重点是完成第三阶段，然后对筛选过程进行批判性反思。这将使研究更加完善和团结，从而更好地界定研究范围和审查进程。研究小组将再次对全文筛选的结果进行批判性反思。这将有助于编制全文编码指南，使从每一份合格出版物收集的信息保持统一。尽管全文编码指南中将提供的一些信息是显而易见的（例如，标题、作者、出版期刊、焦点人群），需要围绕潜在的研究设计、预期结果以及如何最好地分类和呈现结果进行更详细的讨论。
and Full-Text Is this study focused on U.S. populations? Yes, Not Sure Are graduate students a major focus of this study? Yes, Not Sure Are the students in an Engineering discipline/field of study? Yes, Not Sure Does the abstract discuss mental health? Yes, Not Sure Full-Text Only What mental health keyword terms are used? Any non-chronic ailment. What degree programs are the students a part of? Masters, Doctoral, Graduate What disciplines are explicitly stated? Engineering Where was this article published? Any journal publication. Conclusions and Future Work Although they have been touched on through other aspects of this project, Stage 4: Charting the Data and Stage 5: Collating, Summarizing and Reporting the Results are still in progress. The current focus is the completion of Stage 3 before critically reflecting on the screening process. This will allow for more refinement and solidarity and therefore a better-defined research scope and review process. The research team will critically reflect once more on the results from the full-text screening. This will enable a full-text coding guide to be developed so that the information collected from each eligible publication is uniform. Although some of the information that will be presented in the fulltext coding guide is evident (e.g., title, author, journal of publication, focus population), there needs to be lengthier discussions surrounding potential study designs, anticipated results, and how to best categorize and present results.