Development of the PROMIS negative psychosocial expectancies of smoking item banks.
Development of the PROMIS negative psychosocial expectancies of smoking item banks.
复制标题
制定吸烟项目库的 PROMIS 负面社会心理预期。
DOI：
10.1093/ntr/ntt282
复制
发表时间：
2014
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Cai,Li
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Stucky,BrianD;Edelen,MariaOrlando;Tucker,JoanS;Shadel,WilliamG;Cerully,Jennifer;Kuhfeld,Megan;Hansen,Mark;Cai,Li
吸烟的负面心理社会预期包括社会不赞成和对自己的失望。本文介绍了分析进行开发和评估项目银行评估的心理社会期望之间的日常和非日常吸烟者。研究对象为吸烟者（N= 4，201）和非吸烟者（N= 1，183），我们进行了一系列项目因素分析、项目反应理论分析和项目功能差异分析（根据性别、年龄和种族/民族），以得出一组针对每日吸烟者和非每日吸烟者的单维心理社会预期项目。我们还评估了性能的短形式（SFs）和计算机自适应测试（CAT），以有效地评估社会心理expectations.ResultsA共21个项目包括在社会心理预期项目银行：14个项目是常见的日常和非日常吸烟者，6个是独特的日常，和1个是独特的非日常。对于每日吸烟者和非每日吸烟者，心理社会期望项目库是强一维的，高度可靠的（可靠性分别为0.95和0.93），并且在性别，年龄和种族/民族组中表现相似。每日吸烟者和非每日吸烟者共同的SF由6个项目组成（可靠性= 0.85）。从模拟CAT的结果表明，平均而言，少于8个项目需要评估心理社会期望有足够的精度时，使用项目banks.ConclusionsPsychosocial expectations吸烟可以评估的基础上，这些项目银行通过SF，通过使用CAT，或通过一组定制的项目选择一个特定的研究目的。
IntroductionNegative psychosocial expectancies of smoking include aspects of social disapproval and disappointment in oneself. This paper describes analyses conducted to develop and evaluate item banks for assessing psychosocial expectancies among daily and nondaily smokers.MethodsUsing data from a sample of daily (N= 4,201) and nondaily (N=1,183) smokers, we conducted a series of item factor analyses, item response theory analyses, and differential item functioning analyses (according to gender, age, and race/ethnicity) to arrive at a unidimensional set of psychosocial expectancies items for daily and nondaily smokers. We also evaluated performance of short forms (SFs) and computer adaptive tests (CATs) to efficiently assess psychosocial expectancies.ResultsA total of 21 items were included in the Psychosocial Expectancies item banks: 14 items are common across daily and nondaily smokers, 6 are unique to daily, and 1 is unique to nondaily. For both daily and nondaily smokers, the Psychosocial Expectancies item banks are strongly unidimensional, highly reliable (reliability = 0.95 and 0.93, respectively), and perform similarly across gender, age, and race/ethnicity groups. A SF common to daily and nondaily smokers consists of 6 items (reliability = 0.85). Results from simulated CATs showed that, on average, fewer than 8 items are needed to assess psychosocial expectancies with adequate precision when using the item banks.ConclusionsPsychosocial expectancies of smoking can be assessed on the basis of these item banks via the SF, by using CAT, or through a tailored set of items selected for a specific research purpose.